Evaluation

A blue pictogram of a sheet of paper with several lines each marked with a tick/checkmark.
© Uni MS - Web und Design

The evaluation of studies and teaching at the University of Münster is oriented towards the entire student life cycle (SLC) and systematically collects relevant data to evaluate and further develop degree programs in a data-driven manner. Established evaluation instruments (surveys, data, and key performance indicators) are used to capture important information for each phase of study, from study orientation to the time after graduation.

The results are prepared in a standardized and user-oriented way and made available to departments on a regular basis. They are intended to support the identification of development potential, the initiation of targeted measures for quality development, and the verification of their effectiveness.

Emphasis is placed on data minimization: students should only participate in as many surveys as absolutely necessary. On the other hand, data protection is taken into account, as results are only reported if anonymity can be guaranteed. Furthermore, the surveys, data, and key performance indicators are regularly developed further according to scientific standards in order to permanently secure and improve the quality of studies and teaching.

Five phases of the student life cycle

Surveys

  • degree program survey

    The evaluation of studies and teaching at the University of Münster is oriented towards the entire student life cycle and systematically collects relevant data to evaluate and further develop degree programs in a data-driven manner. Established evaluation instruments (surveys, data, and key performance indicators) are used to capture important information for each phase of study, from study orientation to the time after graduation.

    • The results are prepared in a standardized and user-oriented way and made available to departments on a regular basis. They are intended to support the identification of development potential, the initiation of targeted measures for quality development, and the verification of their effectiveness. 
    • Emphasis is placed on data minimization: students should only participate in as many surveys as absolutely necessary. On the other hand, data protection is taken into account, as results are only reported if anonymity can be guaranteed.

    Furthermore, the surveys, data, and key performance indicators are regularly developed further according to scientific standards in order to permanently secure and improve the quality of studies and teaching.

  • Graduate survey

    The graduate survey at the University of Münster is part of the nationwide cooperative project "Absolventenstudien" (KOAB) and has been conducted annually since 2007. Graduates and doctoral graduates are surveyed one to two years after completing their degrees on topics such as study conditions, transition to employment or further study, acquisition of competencies, and use and evaluation of central service facilities.

    • This covers several phases of the Student Life Cycle (SLC), particularly the course of study, the completion phase, and the period thereafter. The university uses various standardized questionnaire variants, which are developed and regularly revised according to scientific criteria within the framework of the cooperative project.
    • The survey results are provided to the University of Münster by the Institute for Applied Statistics (ISTAT), which coordinates the survey scientifically and technically. Department 5.3 is responsible for organizing the survey, sending invitations and reminders, and evaluating the survey in compliance with data protection regulations.
    • The results are prepared and standardized in the form of graphical reports and passed on to the departments for program development. Individual evaluations are also possible after consultation. Through the annual implementation of the survey, it is also possible for smaller programs to obtain evaluations at the program level by matching data from multiple cohorts.
    • The University of Münster supports an increase in the response rate through the use of incentives and comprehensive communication measures.

    The graduate survey thus provides valuable insights that contribute to improving programs and central service areas. Departments and central institutions can also introduce their own questions to cover specific topics.

  • Student Survey in Germany

    The University of Münster participates every four years in the nationwide survey "Studying in Germany" (SiD) conducted by the German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW), which was first implemented in the summer semester of 2021. The SiD survey primarily provides data on the course of study, as well as data on the initial phase of studies.

    • At least all students in the 3rd/4th semester, as well as 25% of students in other semesters, are surveyed on various topics, including study characteristics, social background, political attitudes, financial and living situations, diversity, international mobility, study situation, and student services.
    • The questionnaire is standardized and does not allow for additional questions to be added. Following the survey, the university receives a raw dataset containing nearly all characteristics and responses from the participants. Occasionally, comparisons with the national average are also possible.
    • Department 5.3 is responsible for evaluating and organizing the survey. The collected data can be used for analyses at the university level on topics such as diversity, financial situation, and social background, as well as for individual analyses for faculties upon request.

    By doing so, the SiD survey contributes to improving study conditions and support structures at the University of Münster. The most recent survey took place in the summer semester of 2025, and the next survey is scheduled to be conducted again in the summer semester of 2029.

  • Student course evaluation

    The student course evaluation (LVE) is primarily a feedback instrument for instructors to ensure and develop the quality of their courses at the University of Münster. It is regularly used by students to provide constructive and respectful feedback to instructors.

    • At least every two years, all curriculum-based courses and courses taught by full-time instructors must be evaluated, although a more frequent evaluation cycle is possible and common.
    • The evaluation is usually conducted online using the central evasys system, which ensures anonymity and security against manipulation through the use of a personalized TAN procedure. In exceptional cases, paper questionnaires can be used.
    • The questionnaires contain mandatory core questions that focus on the quality of the course, particularly the instructor(s) and didactics. Optional modules and individual questions can be added as needed.
    • After completing the LVE, instructors and deans receive timely detailed evaluations with quantitative results and free-text comments, which should be discussed with students in the course.
    • The publication of the results takes place on the intranet pages of the departments. The responsibility for conducting the LVE lies with the evaluation officers responsible for the respective evaluation units.

    The LVE thus supports the quality assurance and development of teaching at the University of Münster in a transparent, data-driven, and data-protection-compliant manner.

  • additional surveys

    In addition to the central surveys, the University of Münster, as well as individual subjects and faculties, regularly or on an ad-hoc basis participate in further surveys. These supplementary surveys provide valuable, topic-specific information on various phases of the Student Life Cycle and at different levels of the university.

    Examples include

    • the surveys conducted as part of the "Benchmark International University" (BintHo) project by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), which focuses on internationality,
    • and the survey on success factors of digital university teaching (EdiHo) by the Institute for Applied Statistics (ISTAT), which examined digital teaching during the first "coronavirus semester".

    Moreover, individual subjects participate in the regular student survey as part of the CHE ranking. The results serve as valuable information for prospective students when deciding on a place of study and can also be used by the departments for quality assurance and development of their degree programs.

  • Survey planner

    To avoid multiple surveys and associated "survey fatigue" among students, the University of Münster coordinates all central and as many decentralized surveys as possible through a survey calendar. This calendar documents when which surveys are conducted and which student cohorts are being addressed. The goal is that each cohort participates in each central survey no more than once throughout their studies - with the exception of the regular course evaluations. The calendar also enables faculties to coordinate their own surveys with the central surveys in a timely manner. By doing so, the survey calendar creates transparency, prevents overlaps, and helps to distribute the burden on students evenly. 

    Survey calendar (internal)

The figure shows the evaluation tools (surveys and key figures) of the QMS differentiated according to the phases of the student life cycle.
© Uni Münster - Web und Design

Data and figures: QM data reports

In addition to surveys, statistical data and key performance indicators form an essential basis for evaluation. The faculties regularly receive QM data reports that are used for quality development in studies and teaching. These reports contain, among other things, data on first-year students, study courses, graduation rates, study duration, and grade distributions.

The QM data reports are created at the program level, contain standardized tables and graphics, and also represent time series to make developments and trends visible. Additionally, differences by gender or nationality are shown. The reports summarize relevant information compactly and are designed to be understandable and easily usable even for users who are less familiar with numbers.

The QM data reports form the basis for program conferences and further QM processes. They are intended to help departments identify areas where action is needed, develop targeted measures, and check their effectiveness. To ensure timeliness and accuracy, the QM reports are reviewed regularly and adapted as needed.

For programs with additional legal requirements - state examination, church, international cooperation, continuing education, and dual study programs - the surveys and data collection are adjusted accordingly (see special features).

The QM data reports are made available annually by Department 5.3 on department-specific Confluence pages, whose access rights are managed by the departments themselves. Thus, the data and key figures make an important contribution to the data-driven further development of the programs and increase transparency in the quality management system.

Specific features

At the University of Münster, there are programs with additional legal requirements, including state examination, church, international cooperation, continuing education, and dual degree programs. For these programs, the organization of surveys and data management is often complex because students may be optionally enrolled or exam administration is not centralized.

In order to reflect these special characteristics, the responsibility for surveys and the compilation of data and key performance indicators lies with the respective faculties and evaluation units, which work closely with Department 5.3. For programs with a cooperation agreement, the data management and survey organization are also regulated in the agreement.

Further development of the evaluation tools

The surveys and QM data reports of the University of Münster are regularly reviewed and further developed as part of the ongoing improvement of the Quality Management System. The goal is to close existing gaps in the representation of the Student Life Cycle and address new issues in quality management. In doing so, care is taken to coordinate the evaluation instruments sensibly with each other to avoid redundancies and ensure data efficiency.

Since introducing new procedures is time-consuming and resource-intensive, the further development takes place step by step and according to scientific standards. This way, the evaluation of studies and teaching is continuously optimized to provide the departments with reliable and practice-oriented decision-making bases for quality development.

Privacy protection

Data protection is of central importance in all procedures. The University of Münster strictly adheres to the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act of North Rhine-Westphalia (DSG NRW). Personal data, such as address data for invitations, are used exclusively for this purpose and deleted after completion of the survey process.

There is no link to the survey results. Even with small sample sizes, the anonymity of participants is maintained. Due to the personal reference to teachers, additional data protection regulations apply to the evaluation of student teaching events.

Roles and responsibilities

Within the framework of collecting, processing, and evaluating data related to studies and teaching, roles and responsibilities are clearly defined. At the central level, Department 5.3 coordinates the surveys, prepares the data, and provides the faculties with data protection-compliant reports. At the decentralized level, the QM representatives in the faculties are responsible for utilizing the results. Optionally, data analysts can be deployed to work with raw data and conduct their own evaluations.

For all parties involved, the principles of data economy, purpose limitation, confidentiality, and secure handling of data apply. This ensures that information is used in a targeted manner for quality development while simultaneously ensuring data protection and transparency.