• Vita

    Marian Füssel studied Modern History, Sociology and Philosophy at the University of Münster (1995-2000), where he worked as a Research assistant in Special Research Field 496 „Symbolic communication and social value systems from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution " at the University of Münster. He was awarded a PhD in 2004 with a thesis on ‘Scholarly Culture as Symbolic Practice: Status, Ritual and Conflict at the University in the Early Modern Period’. In the Summerterm 2008 he held a Junior-Professorship for Cultural History at the University of Giessen and from, 2008-2010 a Heyne tenured Junior Professorship for Early Modern History, with main research field in Non-European History at the University of Göttingen. Since WS 2010/11 Professor (W3) holding a chair for Early Modern History with special focus on the History of Science at the University of Göttingen. He was a Senior Fellow from the winter semester 2017/18 to the summer semester 2018 and an Honorary Fellow in the winter semester 2020/21 at the Historisches Kolleg in Munich. Füssel is a full member of the Göttingen Academy of Sciences and a member of the Lower Saxony Historical Commission. His main fields of expertise are early modern cultural history, history of knowledge, military history and history and theory. In the summer semester of 2026, he began work on a monograph on war crimes committed by European armies since the late 17th century.

  • Forschungsprojekt

    Kriegsverbrechen. Zur Konstruktion und Sanktion illegitimer militärischer Gewalt im langen 18. Jahrhundert

    The implementation of the rules of warfare within the framework of international humanitarian law remains a constant challenge right up to the present day. In the 18th century, during the era of early modern international law, the situation was even more drastic, as institutions such as the International Court of Justice or norms such as the Hague Convention on Land Warfare did not exist. Supranational sanctions were out of reach. The Leviathan of the princely state had established a monopoly on the use of force internally, but between states, it was virtually impossible to curb the use of military force. International law grapples with a ‘claim to standardisation without a monopoly on power’; that is to say, from the perspective of the research focus of this research group, with attempts to standardise pluralistic patterns of rules governing the use of force or a ius in bello. Yet this situation did not lead contemporaries to stand idly by and watch violations of the rules. This is where the project comes in, examining the origins of and approaches to ‘war crimes’ during the long 18th century. Drawing on situations of violence such as battles, sieges and captivity, and acts of violence such as sexual violence, looting and massacres, this study analyses the competition between norms and attempts to contain violence from a praxeological perspective.  

  • Einschlägige Veröffentlichungen

    Gelehrtenkultur als symbolische Praxis. Rang, Ritual und Konflikt an der Universität der Frühen Neuzeit, Darmstadt 2006.

    Multinormativität in der Gelehrtenkultur? Versuche der Normierung „guter gelehrter Praxis“ im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, in: Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History, 25 (2017), S. 127-136.

    Die Welt in Flammen. Zur Historischen Anthropologie des Siebenjährigen Krieges (1756-1763), in: Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 11/12 (2020), S. 605-619.

    Wissen. Konzepte, Praktiken, Prozesse, Frankfurt a. M. 2021.

    »Orders is so very Strick’d to keep every thing regular«. Irreguläre Gewalt der britischen Armee während des Siebenjährigen Krieges (1756-1763), in: Birgit Aschmann u.a. (eds.), »When you catch one kill him slowly« Militärische Gewaltkulturen von der Frühen Neuzeit bis zum Zweiten Weltkrieg, Frankfurt a.M. 2024, pp. 129-156.

    The World in Flames. A Global History of the Seven Years' War, New York 2025.