Good supervision – strong concepts – new ideas

Supervising doctoral researchers and postdocs means taking responsibility for emerging researchers and for our academic system. Münster CERes invites you to join us in thinking about frameworks, benchmarks and methods of quality assurance – for a strong research culture and high-quality training for postgraduate researchers at our university. We are here to support you as advisors, trainers and partners – whether you are applying for external funding in which support for graduates plays a role, planning a summer school or developing new formats. Do feel free to contact us.

 

 

Next Generation Research SuperVision
Next Generation Research SuperVision

Transforming the culture and practice of research supervision

As a practitioner partner in the Next Generation Research SuperVision Project (RSVP), the Münster Centre for Emerging Researchers (CERes) is committed to promoting a positive supervisory culture at the university and creating the best conditions for excellent research. Based on empirical data and insights from renowned UK universities, collaborative formats for the professional development of supervisors are being developed and piloted, building on your expertise. These interventions provide an opportunity to reflect on your supervisory practice and share experiences that will strengthen excellent doctoral supervision at our university in a sustainable manner.

  • The project

    Surveys indicate that doctoral researchers identify supervision as the strongest predictor of satisfaction and success in their degree programme (Clegg, Houston, & Gower, 2024; Liu et al., 2023). The large UK Research Supervision Survey 2024 focuses on the perspective of supervisors. According to the survey, most supervisors enjoy their role. They face increasing challenges in supporting doctoral researchers in areas such as promoting self-confidence and focus, high workloads, and mental or financial challenges (UK Research Supervision Survey 2024).

    New supervisors often initially draw on experiences from their own qualification period, but these may need to be adapted to the current contexts and individual needs of postgraduate researchers (Whittington et al., 2021). As part of RSVP, a pool of interventions for the scientifically based professionalisation of supervision is being developed, which is aligned with the criteria outlined in the UKCGE Good Supervisory Practice Framework (Taylor, 2020) and takes into account interdisciplinary, experience-related and regulatory differences. In an experiential learning approach, interventions are co-created, tested in diverse contexts and evaluated.

    The aim of the project is to continuously expand the pool of scholarly trained supervisors in order to enable an inclusive and positive supervisory culture and to optimally support the next generation of researchers.

  • RSVP – Adding value

    CERes invites you to participate in piloting RSVP interventions in order to engage in dialogue with us and each other and to actively participate in the development of new concepts and formats. We see great potential in interdisciplinary discourse, but also in the discussion of specific needs in the departments. In collaborative formats and peer-to-peer learning interventions, you will get the chance to share your practice and have purposeful, enriching conversations about supervision. This will foster supportive networks and strengthen a professional supervisory culture.

    Are you writing a funding proposal in which graduate researcher support plays a role? Consider our interventions for supervisors as quality assurance measures. Are you planning a faculty meeting and need inspiration for programme planning? How about a short session to reflect together on your supervisory approaches and philosophies? Do you feel that something is amiss in a supervisory relationship and would like to discuss it? Take advantage of opportunities for confidential exchange with other experienced supervisors at the university.

  • Interventions

    Supervisors‘ dialogue – Roles and approaches: Depending on the needs of your group, this dialogue offers space for one to two hours of intensive and interactive reflection on your own supervision practice. Theoretical models from the extant literature on doctoral supervision encourage an analytical examination of your own role and the overcoming of habitual practices in order to flexibly adapt them to the context, values and needs.

    • One-off session, 60-90 minutes, groups of professors at all levels of experience in supervision
    • If you are interested in a Supervisors' dialogue for your group, please feel free to contact us.

    Supervision practice network: Supervisors from all disciplines and experience levels are invited to participate in regular semi-open discussions on the topic of doctoral supervision. The objective of the programme is to enhance self-confidence through collegial dialogue and to refine supervisory practices in a practical manner. Participants gain new insights and develop concrete strategies for their work.

    • One open info session, six network sessions in small, continuing group over a six-month period, online or in person.
    • If you are interested in participating, please contact us.
National Report 2025
National Report on Early Career Researchers 2025
© Konsortium BuWiK, wbv

Early career researchers in Germany

The National Report on Early Career Researchers (BuWiK) is published once per legislative period and provides current empirical findings on the situation of doctoral and postdoctoral researchers in Germany. The 2025 edition focuses on the establishment of the tenure track professorship. The report offers supervisors data-based knowledge on the developments in career paths, employment conditions and challenges in early academic careers.

Position paper, April 2023
© Wissenschaftsrat

The German Science and Humanities Council on doctorates

The academic system is changing constantly. A significant increase in the number of doctorates, a diversification of training possibilities, and new developments relating to regulations on doctorates were a reason for the German Science and Humanities Council (Wissenschaftsrat) to draw up a comprehensive position paper (April 2003). The positions set out benefit from a much improved situation today regarding data – as a result of the introduction of statistics covering doctoral candidates and of large-scale studies carried out over the past few years.

Large-scale longitudinal study
© nacaps

National Academics Panel Study

The data portal of the Nacaps study provides a wide range of results relating to the situation of doctoral candidates in Germany. Since 2019, the German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, DZHW) has been collecting comprehensive data covering 20,000 people in each round of surveys (2019, 2021, 2023); the work has been funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Take a look at the data relating to personal backgrounds and motivation, training conditions, academic work, and career paths. Did you know that 66% of doctoral researchers are satisfied or very satisfied with the supervision provided by their primary supervisor?

Quality Circle for Doctorates
© Peter Leßmann

Shaping supervision together – impulses for supervisors

Take a little time and use the brochure entitled “Shaping doctorates together – recommendations for supervisors” issued by the Quality Circle for Doctorates – to reflect on your own role as supervisor. How much weight do you give to motivation in selecting and recruiting doctoral candidates? Are the expectations on both sides as regards working together clear right from the start? How do you support doctoral researchers on their way to submitting their thesis and taking the oral examination? How do you support the establishment of networks and entry into a career? What does “good supervision” actually mean for you personally?

Handbooks, networks, annual conferences
Handbooks, networks, annual conferences

Gaining and sharing impulses within UniWiND

© UniWiND

Are you familiar with the publications of the German University Association of Advanced Graduate Training (Universitätsverband zur Qualifizierung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses in Deutschland, UniWiND)? Higher education managers from all over Germany and German-speaking countries, as well as (emerging) researchers with an interest, are networked here with the aim of setting benchmarks, developing new concepts, and embedding quality assurance. A wide range of topics can be found here: sensitivity to diversity in supporting graduates, perspectives for postdocs, competency models for training doctoral researchers, or quality assurance for doctorates in medicine. The Münster CERes team is present at the annual conferences and is actively involved in a variety of networks and working groups.