Editorial Team

Journal Management

  • Lukas Röseler (University of Münster): Journal Manager / EIC
  • Prince Oppong Boakye (University of Münster): Reproducibility Manager
  • Miriam Müller (University of Münster): Editorial Assistant

Associate Editors

  • Flavio Azevedo (University of Utrecht): Political Science
  • Lukas Wallrich (Birkbeck University of London): Management Sciences, Psychology, Methods
  • Edzer Pebesma (University of Münster): Geosciences
  • Elen le Foll (University of Cologne): Linguistics
  • Janik Goltermann (University of Münster): Mental Health, Neuroimaging
  • Lydia Riedl (Marburg University): Linguistics, Neuroscience, Metascience
  • Max Korbmacher (Haukeland University Hospital): Neuroscience, Psychology
  • Steven Verheyen (Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences): Cognitive Psychology, Methods, Experimental Philosophy
  • Susanne Adler (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München): Marketing
  • Thomas Rhys Evans (University of Greenwich): Psychology, Methods
  • Ulrike Gut (University of Münster): Linguistics

Institutional OJS Support
We are grateful to the University of Münster's OJS team, consisting of Stephanie Klötgen, Elisabeth Sawatzky, Jens Unkenholz and Claudia Mohr, for their wonderful support in working with Open Journal Systems.

Guidelines for Editors

  • Handling and Crediting of Additional Comments
    Peer review is open to every researcher who provides comments on the article before the respective deadline. While feedback external reviewers (in contrast to invited reviewers) will be incorporated into the review letters, external reviewers will not be credited by the journal as reviewers as they do not fill out the reviewer disclosure form (see Review Guidelines). In the case of many thorough external reviews, editors should consider issueing an open call for comments on the respective manuscript.

  • Different Standards Between Fields
    Editors acknowledge that methodological and conceptual standards across fields vary. To allow research from fields with less strict standards to be published, too, editors are responsible for the reviews to be framed adequately.

  • Editorial Members’ Conflict of Interest
    For the foundation of Replication Research, we gathered experts on replication research from various disciplines. At the same time, replication research is conducted and published only rarely. This might lead to potential conflicts of interests, where members of the editorial team or their close colleagues submit research articles. For this reason, we require reviewers to disclose whether they have been working together with the author / one of the authors or with the handling editor. If an editor is a co-author in a submitted manuscript, they must include a COI statement and a different editor must handle the submission.

 
Replication Research Network

In summer 2024, an international network of researchers has finalized a research proposal for the foundation of a publication platform for replication research. This journal is the result of this project. The proposal is openly available:

Röseler, L. (2024). Research Proposal: Replication Journal (Topical Program). Retrieved from https://osf.io/p4dzb

Timeline for the formation of the journal ‘Replication Research’