A decision that sets a precedent? Parliamentary reservation for crosses – Note on VGH Munich, judgment of 8 July 2025, ref. 7 BV 21.336

Authors

  • Dr Damian Patting

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17879/zkr-2025-9007

Keywords:

Freedom of religion, State neutrality principle, Crucifix judgment, religious symbols

Abstract

The article critically examines the judgement of the Bavarian Administrative Court of 8 July 2025, which ruled that the refusal to remove a cross from the entrance area of a state grammar school was unlawful. The commentary emphasises that the Administrative Court did not sufficiently consider key aspects of the case, in particular the specific constellation of the exercise of fundamental rights in schools and the neutrality of the state. The article classifies the decision within existing constitutional and European case law and discusses the relation to the “Kruzifixerlass”.

Author Biography

Dr Damian Patting

Damian Raphael Patting (born 1989), Doctor of law, is a legal adviser for the State of North Rhine-Westphalia. Prior to this, he spent three years as a legal adviser in the Brussels office of the Plenipotentiary of the Council of the Protestant Church in Germany.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-04

Issue

Section

Comments on decisions