WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:01.080 --> 00:00:09.269
[Music]

00:00:11.200 --> 00:00:15.950
If you imagine that we're sitting here
and you're listening to me talking, but

00:00:15.950 --> 00:00:21.740
also a car goes past, you can distinguish
these two sounds in your in your mind:

00:00:21.740 --> 00:00:25.579
They're two separate entities. And
similarly, if you're listening to an

00:00:25.579 --> 00:00:29.840
orchestra, you can hear the violin, you
can hear the oboe, you can hear the voice.

00:00:29.840 --> 00:00:33.920
And if you think about what's actually
happening in your brain, that's rather

00:00:33.920 --> 00:00:39.230
remarkable, because what's reaching your
ear is just a single sound wave, and yet

00:00:39.230 --> 00:00:44.140
our brain is able to break the sound
wave up into its composite parts, and

00:00:44.140 --> 00:00:51.859
that is an example of something that we
call a Fourier transform. So, it's in some

00:00:51.859 --> 00:00:55.519
sense you're given some signal, and
you want to distill it into its

00:00:55.519 --> 00:01:02.629
fundamental components. So, the
theory of Fourier series is a very old

00:01:02.629 --> 00:01:06.230
and very beautiful subject. And in
some sense, representation theory, which

00:01:06.230 --> 00:01:11.299
is my field, is some very vast
generalization of the theory of

00:01:11.299 --> 00:01:18.340
Fourier series. I never found mathematics
particularly deep or inspiring in school.

00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:24.860
For me it was something that I could do
easily, but I didn't find it profound. I

00:01:24.860 --> 00:01:31.130
found poetry profound, I found philosophy
profound. And then I remember in third

00:01:31.130 --> 00:01:37.939
year, in undergrad in Sydney, I went to
a course on Galois theory, and I saw a

00:01:37.939 --> 00:01:41.479
subject that I just never ever would
have come up with, had I thought

00:01:41.479 --> 00:01:47.479
about it for a long long long long time.
And I was absolutely amazed at the depth

00:01:47.479 --> 00:01:50.719
of this subject, and in some sense this
is a subject that is still very alive

00:01:50.719 --> 00:01:55.670
today, Galois theory. So this was
definitely a turning point, to see the

00:01:55.670 --> 00:02:00.829
the depth that mathematics is capable of.
I've actually spent quite a lot of time

00:02:00.829 --> 00:02:04.920
thinking about what motivates me in
mathematics.

00:02:04.920 --> 00:02:10.709
I think that one aspect of it is just
the incredible beauty of the theory. Both

00:02:10.709 --> 00:02:15.450
in its kind of broader sense,
and also in the specificity of the

00:02:15.450 --> 00:02:18.989
examples and the fact that you can
really work something out and see that a

00:02:18.989 --> 00:02:25.890
number is one or two. It's very exciting
on the other hand: Barry Mazur

00:02:25.890 --> 00:02:31.709
calls mathematics humanity's
longest conversation. And I think that

00:02:31.709 --> 00:02:36.239
this is a really beautiful description
of how we function as a mathematical

00:02:36.239 --> 00:02:41.069
community. Thats where I kind of imagine
us all sitting around this enormous

00:02:41.069 --> 00:02:47.040
table, and you work very hard to be able
to say one little thing in this long

00:02:47.040 --> 00:02:52.319
conversation that is mathematics. And I
find the social aspect of

00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:57.540
mathematics incredibly inspiring, and the
exposure to many different ideas, many

00:02:57.540 --> 00:03:01.769
different people, the ability to travel,
the ability to collaborate. These are

00:03:01.769 --> 00:03:05.519
extremely strong motivations for me
as a mathematician. And I don't think

00:03:05.519 --> 00:03:09.359
that was so much the case when I
began. When I began I just wanted to

00:03:09.359 --> 00:03:13.190
understand, and I wanted to sit in my
room, and I wanted to work things out.

00:03:13.190 --> 00:03:18.770
Whereas now I feel much more like I'm
part of an amazing community.

00:03:18.770 --> 00:03:24.370
[Music]
I had two very difficult times in my

00:03:24.370 --> 00:03:31.489
career. One was as a PhD student. So, I
arrived and I had the fantastic adviser,

00:03:31.489 --> 00:03:37.099
who saw the world in a very
abstract way. He's a theory

00:03:37.099 --> 00:03:42.769
builder, not a problem solver as such,
and he was explaining to

00:03:42.769 --> 00:03:47.299
me how I should go about solving various
problems. I think by nature I'm much

00:03:47.299 --> 00:03:54.319
more of a problem solver. And at some
point I decided to go to Denmark for a

00:03:54.319 --> 00:03:59.120
period of time, and in this period of
time I decided I'm going to show him

00:03:59.120 --> 00:04:05.030
that he's wrong, that I can just solve
this by hand, and I completely and

00:04:05.030 --> 00:04:11.690
utterly failed. Also it was
incredibly dark in Denmark every day. I

00:04:11.690 --> 00:04:15.349
felt like there was no daylight, and I
was riding my bike to and from the

00:04:15.349 --> 00:04:20.510
office in in the darkness, and at that
point I vowed that I'm just going to

00:04:20.510 --> 00:04:23.750
finish this thesis however I can, and
then leave mathematics and never ever

00:04:23.750 --> 00:04:29.660
come back. This was a really
important time for me, because it made me

00:04:29.660 --> 00:04:34.940
realize that there are many problems in
mathematics you can't just attack

00:04:34.940 --> 00:04:41.690
straight away. The other very difficult
time was as a postdoc: I just found it a

00:04:41.690 --> 00:04:48.470
very lonely experience. I was
working very hard, I didn't have many

00:04:48.470 --> 00:04:52.460
friends. You also move a lot as
a postdoc, you're traveling a lot, so it's

00:04:52.460 --> 00:04:57.139
very difficult to establish
meaningful relationships. I think that we

00:04:57.139 --> 00:05:03.200
underestimate the psychological burden,
that we put on ourselves and our

00:05:03.200 --> 00:05:08.720
PhD students. And the more that I talk to
mathematicians, I realize that often

00:05:08.720 --> 00:05:13.550
people have had periods of
illness or of mental

00:05:13.550 --> 00:05:16.340
health issues or things like that, but we
don't talk about that so much, and I

00:05:16.340 --> 00:05:22.940
think that's a pity. I definitely feel a
genuine sadness that I can't tell people

00:05:22.940 --> 00:05:27.500
about some of the most beautiful
mathematical theories that exist.

00:05:27.500 --> 00:05:32.000
So, one example of this is something called
the Weil conjectures. For me, this is one

00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:35.060
of the most extraordinary achievements
of human kind.

00:05:35.060 --> 00:05:39.740
I find it absolutely remarkable.
It's just as remarkable as a moon

00:05:39.740 --> 00:05:45.950
landing, or something like that. And
yet, almost nobody in the world knows

00:05:45.950 --> 00:05:52.650
about this, so it makes me sad and I also
think that this can lead to loneliness.

00:05:53.140 --> 00:05:56.740
But, I also think that we can make an
effort to communicate more.

00:05:56.960 --> 00:06:01.980
[Music]

00:06:02.220 --> 00:06:07.820
So, this discovery of this family of
counter-examples to the expected bounds

00:06:07.820 --> 00:06:13.030
in Lusztig's conjecture was a very, very
interesting process for me. I was in

00:06:13.030 --> 00:06:20.960
Hongkong visiting Xuhua He, and he was
asking me to explain an enormous amount

00:06:20.960 --> 00:06:26.060
of the theory, and I basically spent
hours and hours every day at the

00:06:26.060 --> 00:06:29.540
whiteboard in his office explaining. And
he was asking extremely good questions

00:06:29.540 --> 00:06:36.139
and we were trying to work on it. I
think, in some sense, he was allowing me

00:06:36.139 --> 00:06:40.340
to put together a whole lot of pieces of
a puzzle, and after that I went to

00:06:40.340 --> 00:06:44.539
Beijing, and I arrived in Beijing, and I
remember everything was kind of swirling

00:06:44.539 --> 00:06:48.650
around in my head. But I had no idea, that
I was about to about to have this idea,

00:06:48.650 --> 00:06:53.990
and then I was in the shower, and I
just suddenly realized. It's the only

00:06:53.990 --> 00:06:58.430
time in my life where I suddenly
realized that something was possible.

00:06:58.430 --> 00:07:02.030
You know, at other points when I've
solved something, it's a gradual process:

00:07:02.030 --> 00:07:05.360
You start feeling more and more
optimistic, and things start to feel more

00:07:05.360 --> 00:07:10.370
and more solid. Whereas here, it was just
boom! It came immediately, and of course I

00:07:10.370 --> 00:07:15.500
needed to check it, but though it was a
real kind of moment, where suddenly it

00:07:15.500 --> 00:07:22.430
became clear in the shower. The
Lusztig conjecture was a central open

00:07:22.430 --> 00:07:29.110
problem in our field, and it was so, it was
put forward in 1980 by George Lusztig. And

00:07:29.110 --> 00:07:36.350
he proposed a way to solve this
conjecture, which was carried out in the

00:07:36.350 --> 00:07:43.599
90s, but somehow it only said that it is
true in the vast majority of cases.

00:07:43.599 --> 00:07:48.129
But there was always this question
about these special cases. So, for us,

00:07:48.129 --> 00:07:55.059
this is for small small prime numbers, and I
discovered that the conjecture

00:07:55.059 --> 00:07:59.529
was not correct, and it was very
interesting, because I was in Beijing at

00:07:59.529 --> 00:08:05.919
the time and just after that
there was a conference in Zhangjiajie,

00:08:05.919 --> 00:08:10.809
where Lusztig was actually present. And I
was going to announce the fact that this

00:08:10.809 --> 00:08:16.269
conjecture was incorrect in certain
cases. I told him this, and he was

00:08:16.269 --> 00:08:23.649
very very shocked initially, but very
very soon he understood what I

00:08:23.649 --> 00:08:28.719
was saying and was also able to explain it
to others. And I was amazed at the speed

00:08:28.719 --> 00:08:33.370
at which he took on these new ideas. I
have to say that, psychologically, for me

00:08:33.370 --> 00:08:38.680
it was quite shocking, because we, as a
field, had been operating under the

00:08:38.680 --> 00:08:41.800
assumption that it was true. And I had
also been operating under the assumption

00:08:41.800 --> 00:08:46.689
that it was true, and that we would prove
it. So, to suddenly realize that the

00:08:46.689 --> 00:08:51.040
situation was much much much more
complicated than we first thought, it

00:08:51.040 --> 00:08:58.060
felt like a step backwards for me, and I
think other people felt this too.

00:08:58.060 --> 00:09:02.110
And so I remember, that for a few
weeks afterwards, I would actually wake

00:09:02.110 --> 00:09:05.199
up in the middle of night, almost having
a nightmare about the fact

00:09:05.199 --> 00:09:09.910
that it was not true. There's one thing
that I would like to say with the Lusztig

00:09:09.910 --> 00:09:13.720
conjecture stuff that I find fascinating.
So, you know, I was working very hard on

00:09:13.720 --> 00:09:16.509
this problem for a long period of time,
from various different points of view, and

00:09:16.509 --> 00:09:24.250
at some point I did these calculations
with my collaborator Ben Elias, and I

00:09:24.250 --> 00:09:28.779
was very very happy with four of them.
I put them up on my wall in Bonn,

00:09:28.779 --> 00:09:32.740
and I was looking at them every day, and
I'd had them up for about two years

00:09:32.740 --> 00:09:37.839
before I went to Hong Kong, and then I
had this idea, and then I came back.

00:09:37.839 --> 00:09:43.569
The remarkable thing that was, that
it was incredibly close to one of the

00:09:43.569 --> 00:09:48.040
pictures on the wall, so, in some
sense, for a very long period of time

00:09:48.040 --> 00:09:52.170
I'd been staring at the answer and not
realised it.

00:09:55.510 --> 00:10:01.230
Yes. So, a few times I've suddenly had the
feeling that something is solved.

00:10:01.230 --> 00:10:07.899
It's an incredibly beautiful feeling, and
there's a standard joke amongst

00:10:07.899 --> 00:10:10.959
mathematicians: That, when you get this
feeling, you should just go and have a

00:10:10.959 --> 00:10:14.760
holiday, because it's so nice and, almost
certainly, you actually haven't solved it.

00:10:14.760 --> 00:10:19.990
Almost certainly you're making a mistake,
and I have to say, that of the ten kind

00:10:19.990 --> 00:10:24.339
of Eureka moments that I felt in my in
my life, eight of them have been wrong. I

00:10:24.339 --> 00:10:28.360
never admit to myself that I cannot
solve it, but I admit to myself that I do

00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:35.529
need a break. So, I think it's extremely
healthy for me. Particularly, I've

00:10:35.529 --> 00:10:41.350
discovered that it's very healthy for me
to move between problems, and so I think

00:10:41.350 --> 00:10:44.709
I'm quite good at being able to say: Okay,
stop thinking about that. I'm not always

00:10:44.709 --> 00:10:48.790
good at that, but I try: Stop thinking about that
and start thinking about this. And you're

00:10:48.790 --> 00:10:52.600
allowed to come back to this later, but
at the moment you're stuck. We have

00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:56.529
something within ourselves that's
very special, which is some way of

00:10:56.529 --> 00:11:01.510
thinking about things. If I look at
mathematicians that I admire, you can see

00:11:01.510 --> 00:11:07.089
that often they use the same technique
throughout their lives, and they're very

00:11:07.089 --> 00:11:11.290
good at that technique, and that is
somehow inherent to them. And I think

00:11:11.290 --> 00:11:19.089
that it's very important to try not to
stifle what is in you, but I'm

00:11:19.089 --> 00:11:25.460
not sure how one manages to do this.
[Music]

00:11:25.460 --> 00:11:30.120
Have a small peek at this incredibly
rich world of modular representation

00:11:30.120 --> 00:11:38.640
theory, that I think is waiting for us.
I would love to understand some...

00:11:38.640 --> 00:11:42.780
There's very interesting connections
with number theory and I would love to

00:11:42.780 --> 00:11:51.330
understand these connections more deeply.
I would love to understand what's going

00:11:51.330 --> 00:11:55.980
on in this conjecture with Lusztig.
I thought about it very hard and banned

00:11:55.980 --> 00:11:59.550
myself from thinking about it for some
time, because I made almost no progress

00:11:59.550 --> 00:12:04.800
on it.
And I think I'm just really

00:12:04.800 --> 00:12:08.710
looking forward to continuing exploring
the mathematical world.

00:12:08.710 --> 00:12:14.049
[Music]

