Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität
Münster
|
Institut für Planetologie Wilhelm-Klemmstrasse 10 48149 Münster Geschäftsführender Direktor: Prof. Dr. Tilman Spohn |
Tel. (0251) 83-33496
Fax: (0251) 83-36301 e-mail: ifp@uni-muenster.de www: http://ifp.uni-muenster.de/ |
|
Forschungsschwerpunkte 2001 - 2002 Fachbereich 14 - Geowissenschaften
|
||||
Thermal evolution, crustal growth, and magnetic field history of Mars
The
thermal evolution, the crustal growth, and the magnetic field history of Mars have been examined with
parameterized models for mantle convection. Comparing the results of these models with observations of
recent missions to Mars, several important aspects of its evolution can be constrained including the evolution of
the tectonic style, the temperature distribution immediately after formation of the core, and the mantle
viscosity. In order to model the thermo-chemical evolution, the effects of crust differentiation, the associated
redistribution of radioactive elements, and the latent heat of melting are included in the parameterization.The
results of the thermo-chemical evolution models fit the observations if Mars cools by stagnant lid convection
throughout its evolution from a comparatively hot initial state after core formation with potential mantle
temperatures of about 2000 ± 100 K and if the Martian mantle has a stiff rheology
(viscosity of about 1021 Pas at a reference temperature of 1600 K) consistent with that of a
dry mantle. The post-accretional temperature distribution, which suggests a 700 to 1100 km deep
magma ocean, is estimated from an energy balance for the core formation process and the initial temperature
distribution determined with the thermo-chemical evolution models. Furthermore, a superheating of the core
by 100 K or more due to the release of gravitational energy during core formation is required to generate
an early, thermally driven dynamo. The evolution of the core temperature and of the core heat flow suggest
that the dynamo switched off a few hundred million years later and did not rejuvenate until today. An
alternative evolution scenario suggesting an early phase of plate tectonics cannot reconcile the observed crustal
evolution. Crust formation is inefficient during the early phase of plate tectonics and is also frustrated later in
the subsequent stagnant lid regime after plate tectonics cooled the interior efficiently.
Beteiligte Wissenschaftler: Veröffentlichungen: |
||||