2. Work in Progress
Workshop Report: Μαντεῖον ἀψευδές. The Sanctuary of Apollo Ptoios in Boeotia. International Workshop on Boeotian Studies organised by Scuola Superiore Meridionale at Naples (13 November 2025)
Lucrezia MASTROPIETRO (Scuola Superiore Meridionale,
lucrezia.mastropietro@unina.it
The
International Workshop on Boeotian Studies, promoted by the
Scuola Superiore Meridionale and coordinated by Professor Carlo
Rescigno, Professor Giovan Battista D’Alessio, and Dr Lucrezia
Mastropietro, brought together scholars from various Italian and
international universities to explore, through an
interdisciplinary approach, the role of the sanctuary of Apollo
Ptoios in shaping Boeotian identity and its place within the
broader religious and cultural landscape of ancient Greece.
After the
institutional greetings by Professor Carlo Rescigno (Università
degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’ / Scuola Superiore
Meridionale), the event began with an opening lecture by
Professor Christel Müller (Université Paris Nanterre). The
presentation began with a reminder of the city’s territory and a
brief overview of the sanctuary of Apollo and its monuments,
which were excavated by members of the French School of Athens
from 1885 onwards. The forthcoming publication (2026?) of a
booklet in the Epitomè collection on Akraiphia and Ptoion,
written by C. Müller, Th. Lucas, and D. Bartzis—the architect
responsible for describing and interpreting the archaeological
remains—was announced. The sanctuary of Ptoion displayed
multiple identities—local, regional, and pan-Boeotian—unlike the
hero sanctuary at Kastraki, where dedications were made mainly
by the people of Akraiphia. A survey of the dedications showed
that two-thirds were individual offerings, mostly dating to the
7th–5th centuries BC, while collective dedications were rare
and, between 500 and 400 BC, addressed to Athena Pronaia,
including by the Boeotians. In the Hellenistic period, activity
revived under the koinon (287–171 BC), evidenced by tripod
dedications mentioning the federal archon, the aphedriats
commission, and a seer (mantis) acting on behalf of the
Confederacy. From 221/0 BC onwards, the Ptoia games in honour of
Apollo were attested, continuing into the imperial period even
after the Hellenistic koinon dissolved, thanks to enduring bonds
of philia and sungeneia between Boeotian poleis. Despite not
serving administrative functions, the sanctuary’s religious
significance means it can be described as a “federal sanctuary.”
This was
followed by a presentation by Michael Alexander Dyer (University
of St Andrews), who focused on the connections linking the
sanctuary with northern Boeotia and Opountian Locris. He first
examined the regional environment, highlighting how both long-
and short-term fluctuations of Lake Kopais shaped a complex
pattern of settlements and networks during the first millennium
BC. He then offered an overview of comparable dedications across
different sites, alongside epigraphic evidence and culturally
similar practices attested in literary sources. In his
concluding remarks, Dyer emphasized the fluid environmental and
political landscape of the region in antiquity, where intense
cultural interaction coexisted with the persistence of local
characteristics.
The second
session, chaired by Dr Davide Amendola (Scuola Superiore
Meridionale), started with a paper by Professor Giovan Battista
D’Alessio (Sapienza Università di Roma / Scuola Superiore
Meridionale), who contributed a critical survey of Pindar’s
fragments related to the Ptoion sanctuary. In this context,
D’Alessio anticipated the results of his revision of the text of
Strabo’s quotation of fragment 51a, based, inter alia, on new
high-quality multispectral images of the Vatican palimpsest. He
more generally provided a fresh assessment of the evidence
offered by Ptoion-related fragments from the books of the
paeans, the processional songs and the hymns, arguing (also on
papyrological grounds) that pae. 7 was meant for performance at
the Ptoion, not at the Ismenion. D’Alessio also examined the
mythical and cultic background of Teneros emerging from the
extant texts, making a case for an original link of the
hero/seer not primarily to Thebes but to Northern and/or
possibly Eastern Boeotia.
Professor
Lucia Prauscello (University of Oxford) then gave a
presentation. She reconsidered the long-standing issue of the
cultic Sitz im Leben for Corinna’s Asopids (PMG 654 coll.
ii–iv), by focusing on the genealogical sub-section of the poem
at col. iii. 32–43, where the speaking mantis detailed the
successions of the prophets incumbent at the mantic site.
Schachter’s interpretation of AK[ΡH]ΦEIN as the Boeotian
adjective equivalent to Attic
ἀκραιφνής was rejected, and Wilamowitz’s
original hypothesis of a cultic setting at Akraiphia or in an
Akraiphia -related sanctuary was explored.
The
presentation by Dr. Marilou de Vals (Université Paris Nanterre)
opened the third session, chaired by Professor Müller. Her paper
focused on the local geology of Boeotia and on the stone
sculptures found in the Ptoion sanctuary. She studied fragments
of kouroi, votive columns, and other sculptures from Boeotia
from the point of view of the material—the nature of the stone
employed. Different limestones were identified macroscopically,
and they appeared to be imported, possibly from the region of
Tanagra and Thebes, as they did not exist in the local
geological context of the Ptoion. Our knowledge of the geology
of Boeotia was still very limited regarding stone resources, and
its study could have provided new insights for understanding the
stone sculptures from this region.
Lucrezia
Mastropietro’s presentation (Scuola Superiore Meridionale)
focused on the kouroi from the Ptoion sanctuary, emphasising
their Boeotian stylistic identity, production, and functions.
The statues display distinct stylistic trends while maintaining
a coherent Boeotian character, reflecting both local traditions
and subtle interactions with broader Greek artistic currents.
The kouroi served both religious and social functions, acting as
markers of communal identity, status, and pan-Boeotian
connections. Overall, they expressed the collective identity,
artistic autonomy, and cultural dynamics of Boeotian society,
highlighting the role of art in reinforcing social cohesion and
regional distinctiveness.
The final
session, chaired by Professor D’Alessio, focused more on the
religious aspects of the sanctuary.
Alice
Solazzo (Università degli Studi di Palermo / Universität
Münster) examined the sanctuary of Apollo Ptoios at Akraiphia to
explore religious connectivity in Archaic Boeotia. Located in
the Lake Kopais landscape, the sanctuary served as a regional
hub, drawing communities together and shaping a shared Boeotian
identity. Using a connectivity-based approach, she analysed how
the sanctuary mediated interactions within broader cultural and
political networks. Its position within the Lake’s hydrological,
ecological, and symbolic environment reinforced its role in
fostering a supra-local identity and demonstrated how devotion
to Apollo Ptoios was embedded in both local practices and
regional dynamics.
Francesco
Ischia (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia) examined
the ritual and ideological significance of tripod cauldrons in
the religious landscape of Boeotia, focusing on the main
sanctuaries where they were documented during the Archaic
period. Although tripod dedications appeared relatively late in
Boeotian sanctuaries, the case of the Ptoion nonetheless
represented the key dynamics that led to the adoption of the
tripod as a votive offering from this period onwards. Its
success, however, was not attributed to any intrinsic 'meaning'
attached to the object itself, but rather to its material and
semiotic properties. These properties also enabled further
developments relating to the monumentalisation of sanctuaries,
and the potential implications of this process for the prophetic
activity of the sanctuary of Apollo.
In sum, the
workshop underscored the Ptoion sanctuary as a central site for
understanding Boeotian religious, artistic, and social life.
Presentations demonstrated how the sanctuary functioned both as
a religious centre and as a hub of pan-Boeotian connectivity,
with art and ritual reinforcing social status and collective
identity. It is hoped that proceedings could be published, and
future research is expected to continue advancing our
understanding of Boeotian material culture, artistic production,
and the broader social and religious dynamics of the region.
