A Find of a Bosporan Coin at Trębaczów, site 2, Kazimierza Wielka district (Poland)
				Zusammenfassung: Der 
				Artikel widmet sich einer Bronzemünze von Sauromates II., dem 
				Herrscher des Bosporanischen Königreichs (174/175–210/211 n. 
				Chr.). Das Stück wurde bei einer archäologischen Untersuchung 
				der Siedlung Trębaczów (Fundstelle 2), Kazimierza Wielka Poviat, 
				entdeckt, die in die Zeit der Przeworsk-Kultur datiert. Vom 
				Nominal als »Dreifach Sestertius« oder »Drachme« angesprochen, 
				gehört die Prägung zu den zwei Serien von Bronzemünzen, die in 
				die Zeit um 186–196 n. Chr. (Zograf 1951; Frolova 1997a) oder in 
				die Jahre um 180–192 n. Chr. (Anokhin 1986) datiert werden.
				Der neu entdeckte Fund erweitert eine kleine Gruppe 
				bosporanischer Münzen, die zwischen der zweiten Hälfte des 1. 
				Jahrhunderts v. Chr. und dem 4. Jahrhundert n. Chr. geprägt und 
				auf dem Gebiet des heutigen Polen entdeckt wurden. Bisher waren 
				sechs derartige Funde bekannt. Das neue Exemplar fand 
				wahrscheinlich in der ersten Hälfte oder in den ersten Jahren 
				der zweiten Hälfte des dritten Jahrhunderts n. Chr. durch 
				Kontakte zwischen verschiedenen Bevölkerungsgruppen im ost- und 
				mitteleuropäischen Barbaricum den Weg zur Siedlung der 
				Przeworsk-Kultur.
				
				
				
Coins minted by the rulers 
				of the Bosporan Kingdom issued from the second half of the 1st 
				century BC until the first half of the 4th century AD are 
				relatively rare finds in the areas of the Roman-period Przeworsk 
				and Wielbark cultures[1]. 
				Previously, six such finds had been recorded in the area of 
				present-day Poland, including four in the region historically 
				known as Lesser Poland, and two in Central Poland: one each in 
				Mazovia and Kujavia (table 1; map 1)[2]. 
				It should be noted that only the last two discoveries have been 
				made in recent years, since the use of metal detectors has 
				become widespread. All the Lesser Poland finds were recorded in 
				the second half of the 19th century and in the first half of the 
				20th century. Therefore, each new discovery of a Bosporan coin 
				is of great importance, not only because of the addition to 
				range of source material, but because it confirms the older 
				finds, and is particularly valuable in cases where these remain 
				doubtful.
				
Map 1: Finds of Bosporan Coins in Poland: 1 – Gąski, Inowrocław District, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship; 2 – Gorlice - Glinik Mariampolski, Lesser Poland Voivodeship; 3 – Nowy Sącz-Zabełcze, Lesser Poland Voivodeship; 4 – Skłóty, Kutno District, Łódź Voivodeship; 5 – Staniątki, Wieliczka District, Lesser Poland Voivodeship; 6 – Trębaczów, Kazimierza Wielka District, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship; 7 – Zarzecze, Przeworsk District, Subcarpathian Voivodeship. Drawing by Jan Bulas
Recently, a new, seventh 
				find of a Bosporan coin was registered in western Małopolska in 
				Trębaczów, commune of Opatowiec, Kazimierza Wielka district (map 
				1). The discovery was made in March 2020 during a surface 
				prospection, carried out with a metal detector in a Roman period 
				settlement by a team of archaeologists from the Arch Foundation[3]. 
				The research, conducted on the basis of permit No. 3493/219 
				issued by the Provincial Conservation Office in Kielce, is part 
				of the »Ekspedycja Rzemienowice« (Rzemienowice Expedition) 
				project, focused on the study of sites from the Roman period in 
				the valley of the Młyńska stream, a tributary on the left bank 
				of the River Vistula. Annual surface prospecting, analysis of 
				satellite images, and aerial prospecting have led to the 
				discovery of many settlements of the Przeworsk culture in this 
				area. Numerous Roman imports have been discovered in all the 
				researched sites, mainly coins and brooches. This pattern 
				corresponds with the finds from the famous settlement (site 2) 
				in Jakuszowice, located 8.5 km as the crow flies from Trębaczów[4]. 
				The aforementioned Młyńska valley is located between the valleys 
				of two much larger tributaries on the left bank of the Vistula, 
				the Nida and Nidzica rivers. The position of the Młyńska stream 
				and the settlements on it had undoubted advantages, among them 
				its location on the extension of one of the most important 
				routes leading from the south to the north, along the River 
				Dunajec. This area was undoubtedly part of an important nexus of 
				cultural and commercial contacts. It should be added that in the 
				same microregion there are other excavated sites where Roman 
				coins have been discovered (including Bejsce and Zagórzyce)[5], 
				and places where accidental discoveries of such items have been 
				recorded (Chwalibogowice, Stary Korczyn, Uściszowice, Wyszogród)[6].
Site no. 2 in Trębaczów was 
				discovered in 2017 as a result of analysis of satellite images 
				and vertical aerial photos taken with an unmanned aerial vehicle 
				(a so-called drone), which revealed the presence of 
				characteristic vegetation anomalies correlating with the remains 
				of sunken or excavated structures typical of the Przeworsk 
				culture settlements. These observations were confirmed in 2018 
				during surface surveys. The settlement in question is situated 
				on a gentle slope in a slightly elevated position above the 
				river valley. During the research, a large amount of ceramic 
				material was registered, including hand-made fragments of 
				Roman-period phase B pottery and Roman-period phase C pottery 
				made on a potter’s wheel. Finds of metal objects allow for a 
				more precise determination of the functioning of the settlement 
				between phase B1 (beginning of the 1st century AD) and at least 
				the end of phase C1 (around the middle of the 3rd century AD). 
				In addition to the aforementioned Bosporan coin, ten other Roman 
				coins were found at the site. These are denarii, including one 
				republican, and nine imperial specimens from the 1st–2nd century 
				AD (map 2). The oldest coin is the republican denarius, 
				an issue of Q. Titus, minted in 90 BC (RRC 
				341/1), and the youngest is a denarius of Commodus 
				from AD 187–188 (RIC 
				III 162 or
				167)[7]. 
				It should be added that in Trębaczów there is another settlement 
				(site 1), located about 400 meters in a straight line 
				from site 2, where also during surface prospecting one denarius 
				was discovered, minted during the reign of Nerva.
The Bosporan coin from site 
				2 was found in the form of a corroded and completely shapeless 
				metal lump, and was thus originally included in the group of 
				insignificant ›junk‹ finds[8]. 
				As a result, exact data relating to the place and time of the 
				discovery were not recorded. Only later, careful inspection of 
				the material and the conservation undertaken resulted in the 
				cleaning of the object and its proper identification. 
				Nevertheless, the precise location of the discovery spot, and 
				thus the detailed context of the find and its possible 
				relationship with other coins discovered at site 2 are not 
				clear.
The specimen found in 
				Trębaczów was minted in the name of Sauromates II 
				(174/175–210/211), the king ruling at the turn of the 2nd and 
				3rd centuries AD (fig. 1); for a similar, better 
				preserved piece cf. fig. 2). During his long reign, the 
				ruler minted copious issues. The coin in question belongs to a 
				series of large bronzes with a portrait of the ruler and the 
				royal title on the obverse, and an eagle and the denominational 
				mark (PMΔ = 144 units) on the reverse. According to the 
				classifications of Aleksandr N. Zograph and Nina A. Frolova, 
				such coins belong to Sauromates II’s second series of bronze 
				coinage and were minted in the years AD 180–196[9]. 
				Vladilen A. Anokhin also includes the type in question in the 
				second series of bronze coins of this ruler, although he dates 
				it to the reign of the Roman Emperor Commodus (180–192)[10]. 
				The researchers have defined the denomination of the issue as a 
				triple sestertius, equal to ¾ of one denarius (Zograph, 
				Anokhin), or as a drachm (Frolova).
Cimmerian Bosporus
Sauromates II (174/175–210/211)
AE, denomination PMΔ
Obv. Diademed and draped bust of Sauromates; r.; ΒΑCΙΛΕWC CΑYΡΟΜΑΤΟΥ; dotted border
Rev. Eagle standing l., head turned back, with wreath in beak; [PMΔ]; dotted border
11.88 g; 29.4 mm; 12 h
Cf. Frolova 1997a, Pl. XCI, 17; Anokhin 1986, 165 no. 618a, Pl. 29; RPC IV Temp. No. 3879
 
						
					
					 
						
					The National Museum in Krakow; Donation of Lech Kokociński; Inv. No. MNK VII-A-6899
Photo courtesy of the National Museum in Krakow
Among the relatively 
				infrequent finds of Bosporan coins in Poland, no discoveries of 
				specimens minted by Sauromates II have been recorded so far (cf.
				table 1)[11]. 
				The closest chronologically to the coin from Trębaczów are the 
				middle bronze (›denarius‹) of his successor Rhescouporis III 
				(211/212–228/229) discovered in Staniątki, Wieliczka district (table 
				1, no. 5)[12] 
				and the so-called ›denarius‹ of Ininthimaeus (234/235–238/239) 
				found in Skłóty, Kutno district (table 1, no. 6)[13]. 
				When analyzing the overall chronological structure of the finds 
				of Bosporan coins discovered in Poland, two groups can be 
				distinguished. One is made up of coins minted in the 1st century 
				AD, effectively consisting of issues from the second half of the 
				century: a bronze of Cotys I (45–68) found in Zarzecze, 
				Przeworsk district (table 1, no. 2)[14] 
				and a sestertius of Rhescouporis II (68/69–91/92), which is part 
				of the alleged hoard discovered in Glinik Mariampolski (now part 
				of Gorlice)[15]. 
				The other group includes the aforementioned coins from the 1st 
				half of the 3rd century AD and the newly discovered coin of 
				Sauromates II. In addition to these groups, there is also a 
				small bronze of Polemon (15–9 BC) from the vicinity of Nowy Sącz 
				(table 1, no. 1), (Nowy Sącz-Zabełcze)[16] 
				and, due to the lack of a precise description, a large bronze 
				(sestertius) of an unspecified Bosporan ruler minted in the 1st 
				or 2nd/3rd century AD, found in Gąski, Inowrocław district (table 
				1, no. 7)[17]. 
				In the latter case, the exact identification of the coin would 
				allow an attribution to the first or second group. It should be 
				noted, however, that the different chronological structure of 
				the groups of finds of Bosporan coins does not necessarily have 
				to be significant in the context of the chronology of their 
				influx into the area of today’s Poland (see below). What is 
				noteworthy, however, is the lack among Polish finds of Bosporan 
				coins minted in the second half of the 3rd and 4th century AD 
				(see below). Unless this is the result of the state of research, 
				the lack of these coins may be important for determining the 
				time of the influx of Bosporan coins into present-day Polish 
				territory[18].
The chronology of Bosporan 
				coins found in Poland is closely related to their denominational 
				structure (cf. table 1). The finds consist only of bronze 
				coins. Furthermore, apart from the coin from Nowy Sącz-Zabełcze 
				(table 1, no. 1), these are items that can be classified 
				as medium (›denarii‹) or large bronzes (sestertii, triple 
				sestertii/drachms) and therefore similar in size to large 
				imperial bronzes. This gives rise to a thesis that at least some 
				of these coins performed a similar function in the Barbaricum as 
				large imperial bronzes[19]. 
				The latter are relatively rare in finds from the Przeworsk 
				culture area, compared to the finds of denarii or their 
				imitations. It is also worth recalling that so far no finds of 
				gold, electrum, silver or bronze Bosporan staters have been 
				registered in the area of today’s Poland.
All the finds of Bosporan 
				coins recorded in contemporary Poland so far come from the areas 
				covered by the settlement of the Przeworsk culture during the 
				Roman period. One can only perhaps consider whether in the case 
				of the find from Nowy Sącz-Zabełcze (table 1, no. 1), 
				based on the date of the influx of the Polemon coin, it should 
				not be associated with the Puchov culture. So far, we do not 
				know of such discoveries from the settlement area of the 
				Wielbark culture or the Masłomęcz group. It seems, however, that 
				this is an effect of the state of the research rather than a 
				reflection of the real situation. Recently, Dr. 
				Kirylo 
				Myzgin identified a find of a coin minted in Chersonesus, 
				possibly from the area of the Masłomęcz group, which 
				potentially confirms the presence of coins from the region of 
				the northern Black Sea shores in the territory of contemporary 
				Poland covered by Gothic settlement during the Roman period[20].
At the same time, it should 
				be emphasized that numerous finds of coins of the rulers of the 
				Bosporan Kingdom have been registered in today’s Ukraine and 
				Russia, mainly in the Cherniakhiv Culture area[21], 
				and also, less numerously, in today’s Moldova, Belarus, and 
				Lithuania[22]. 
				With a small number of finds of such coins in the Roman Balkan 
				provinces and their practical lack in the territories of today’s 
				Slovakia, the Czech Republic and the eastern German Länder, the 
				eastern or south-eastern direction of their influx into today’s 
				Poland seems to be the most likely[23]. 
				The Polish lands seem to constitute the western border of the 
				influx of coins of interest to us in the area of the European 
				Barbaricum. Several finds that form a cluster in the area of 
				today’s Saarland, Hessen, and Baden-Württemberg, i.e. the 
				western and south-western German Länder, should rather be 
				associated with a different historical and cultural context[24].
Among the various 
				hypotheses concerning the circumstances of the influx of 
				Bosporan coins into present-day Polish lands, the most probable 
				seems to be one that links them with internal Barbarian 
				interactions, primarily between the Sarmatians and/or people of 
				the Cherniakhiv, Wielbark and Przeworsk cultures[25]. 
				This type of contact is certainly evidenced by non-numismatic 
				phenomena present in the archaeological material[26]. 
				They intensify from the second half of the 2nd century AD. At 
				that time a clear movement of the Przeworsk and Wielbark Culture 
				population to the east and south-east occurred[27]. 
				Those migrations are widely connected with movements of the 
				Vandals and the Goths which are recorded in the historical and 
				led to the significant changes in the cultural situation in 
				Central and Eastern European Barbaricum during the 3rd century 
				AD[28]. 
				The nature of any contacts, however, remains unclear, at least 
				for the time being, and the question of whether they were 
				commercial, social, or political contacts remains open. Perhaps 
				they were of a complex and varied nature.
In their studies on finds 
				of Bosporan coins in the Cherniakhiv Culture area, Georgiy 
				Beidin and Myzgin distinguished among them three chronological 
				groups. The first consists of coins minted before the so-called 
				Gothic Wars, the second of issues struck during those wars, and 
				the third of coins minted after their conclusion[29]. 
				As a consequence, they proposed a three-phase influx of Bosporan 
				coins, where the individual phases are represented by coins they 
				classified into the three groups mentioned above. Relating this 
				division to the finds from Poland (which it should once again be 
				emphasized were much less numerous) we can confirm that they are 
				made up of coins corresponding to the first and second groups of 
				Beidin and Myzgin. With the small sample of ›Polish‹ finds, it 
				is difficult, however, to assign precisely particular 
				discoveries to the first or second group, and thus to 
				differentiate the time of their influx according to the time of 
				their release[30]. 
				In fact, perhaps, apart from the very early coin of Polemon, 
				allegedly discovered in Nowy Sącz-Zabełcze (table 1, no. 1), 
				it is difficult to place the influx of any Bosporan coin from a 
				›Polish‹ find into a period earlier than the 2nd half of the 2nd 
				century AD. In the case of the coins that we have classified in 
				the second chronological group, this is self-evident, because 
				they were minted in the last quarter of the 2nd century AD or 
				later. The coin of Rhescouporis II (68/69–91/92), which was 
				assumed to be part of the hoard found in Gorlice-Glinik 
				Mariampolski (table 1, no. 3), could have reached the 
				Polish Carpathians not earlier than around the middle of the 2nd 
				century AD, as indicated by the current dating of this deposit[31]. 
				In fact, uncertainty remains only in the case of finds from 
				Zarzecze, Przeworsk district (table 1, no. 2) (the coin 
				of Cotys I (45–68) and Gąski, Inowrocław district (table 1, 
				no. 7) (an undefined king of the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century 
				AD). It seems, however, that in these cases there are also some 
				reasons not to exclude them from the influx in the second half 
				of the 2nd century AD, or even later. The coin from Zarzecze (table 
				1, no. 2) was discovered along with a coin minted in Ascalon 
				in the 1st or 2nd century AD[32]. 
				As for the piece from Gąski (table 1, no. 7), it cannot 
				be ruled out that it was minted as early as the second half of 
				the 2nd or the beginning of the 3rd century AD. Therefore, it 
				seems that most of the Bosporan coins found their way to today’s 
				Poland in the second half of the 2nd or more probably in the 3rd 
				century AD. 
Other monetary finds also 
				provide a point of reference for dating their influx.
Simplifying and briefly 
				describing the issue of the influx of Roman coins to the Central 
				European Barbaricum, we can summarize this problem as follows: 
				most Roman coins minted at imperial mints in the 1st and 2nd 
				centuries AD found their way to the present Polish lands in the 
				last decades of the 2nd and/or the beginning of the 3rd century 
				AD[33]. 
				Some of them, however, could also have arrived even later, in 
				the next two centuries, as a result of the redistribution of the 
				pool of, mainly, denarii and, to a lesser extent, other coins in 
				the Barbarian environment comprising the populations of various 
				archaeological cultures (Przeworsk, Wielbark and Cherniakhiv 
				Cultures) identified in the area of Central and Eastern 
				European Barbaricum[34]. 
				During the later phases of the 3rd century AD, denarii and 
				antoniniani of the 3rd century minted after the reign of 
				Septimius Severus, gold aurei and imperial AEs from the 1st–3rd 
				centuries AD, debased radiates from the 2nd half of the 3rd 
				century AD, as well as smaller numbers of subaerati and other 
				categories of counterfeits, copies and imitations of Roman coins[35]. 
				Again, some of these objects, mainly the copies and imitations, 
				could have come to today’s Polish lands even later. Therefore, 
				even given that certain groups of coins – Greek, Roman 
				Republican issues and Celtic, and maybe even Dacian imitations – 
				found their way to the Central European Barbaricum earlier, it 
				is difficult to accept the thesis that the Bosporan coins 
				arrived before the main mass of Roman coins[36]. 
				Again, a possible exception could be the coin of Polemon found 
				near Nowy Sącz-Zabełcze. Another interesting point of reference 
				for the chronology of the finds of Bosporan coins is the 
				chronological structure of coins minted in the Provincial mints 
				and found within the borders of modern Poland state[37].
Of course, bearing in mind 
				the various possible circumstances of the influx of the Roman 
				provincial coins found in Poland, it is important to note that 
				the vast majority of them were minted in the 3rd century AD, 
				during the reigns of the Severan dynasty or later. It can 
				therefore be assumed that it was during the third century AD 
				that the greatest influx of provincial coins into the territory 
				of contemporary Poland occurred[38]. 
				This is confirmed by the broader perspective of finds from the 
				areas of the settlement of the Cherniakhiv Culture, where 
				numerous provincial coins were discovered, most of which were 
				minted in very similar periods to those most frequently 
				represented in Polish finds[39]. 
				As already mentioned, the contacts among the Przeworsk, Wielbark 
				and Cherniakhiv cultures played an important role in the 
				redistribution of Roman coins.
Taking all this into 
				account, it can be hypothesized that the majority of Bosporan 
				coins found in Poland, regardless of the date of their minting, 
				arrived in the 3rd century AD, perhaps along with some 
				provincial coins and imitations of denarii from area of the 
				Cherniakhiv Culture[40]. 
				This also applies to the coin found in Trębaczów (table 1, 
				no. 4) that is presented here. At the same time, it is 
				impossible to answer unequivocally the question whether the 
				influx of Bosporan coins was the result of events directly 
				related to the Gothic Wars, or whether a different, perhaps more 
				complex reason is behind it. On the other hand, these coins 
				could not have arrived in present-day Poland very late. The lack 
				of finds of Bosporan coins, mainly staters, minted in the 2nd 
				half of the 3rd and in the 4th century AD, seems to provide 
				indirect evidence for. It is true that their absence may be the 
				result of the state of research, but currently we do not know of 
				a single find of such a coin in Poland, althoug such finds are 
				recorded in the Cherniakhiv Culture area[41]. 
				Adding to this the fact that so far the latest Bosporan coin 
				from Poland is a ›denarius‹ of Ininthimeus (234/235–238/239), we 
				can cautiously assume that the influx of Bosporan coins to the 
				Polish lands ended at the latest in the middle, or possibly in 
				the early years of the second half, of the 3rd century AD.
The find of the coin of 
				Sauromates II in Trębaczów (table 1, no. 4) is very 
				important for a further reason. It is the first discovery of a 
				Bosporan coin from Poland made during regular archaeological 
				research. Because of this, it confirms the influx of such coins 
				to Polish lands in the Roman period, and gives credibility to 
				other finds made accidentally or by so-called detectorists. 
				Although the coin does not have a strict archaeological context, 
				its connection with a Roman period settlement is indisputable. 
				It is therefore, like other so-called imports, including coins, 
				testimony to the interregional connections between the 
				settlement in Trębaczów, the microregion in which the settlement 
				was located, and the broader context of the western Małopolska 
				settlements inhabited during the Roman period by the people of 
				the Przeworsk culture. Furthermore, in this context, it is worth 
				mentioning the Roman provincial coins found in the famous 
				settlement in Jakuszowice, located, as mentioned, only 8.5 km 
				away (site 2)[42]. 
				Together with other sorts of imports they proof links between 
				western Małopolska and other regions of Barbaricum and 
				Rome. The nature of these links has been not fully explained, 
				but regardless of whether they were direct or indirect contacts, 
				their interregional nature is not open to discussion.
					
| 
							
							No | 
							
							Reign | 
							
							Metal | 
							
							Denomination | 
							
							Dates | 
							
							Find spot | 
							
							References | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
							1 | 
							Polemon (15–9) | 
							AE | 
							 | 
							15–9 BC | 
							Nowy Sącz 
							–Zabełcze | 
							Frolova 1997a, 
							42, type III, Pl. XV, 15–16a | 
| 
							2 | 
							Cotys I (45–68) | 
							AE | 
							 | 
							AD 63–68 | 
							Zarzecze, 
							Przeworsk District | 
							
							Frolova 1997a, 10 f., Pl. 
							XIV, 7–10; 
							
							RPC I no. 1930 | 
| 
							3 | 
							Rhescuporis II 
							(68/69–91/92) | 
							AE | 
							Sestertius | 
							AD 80–93 | 
							Gorlice-Glinik 
							Mariampolski | 
							
							Frolova 1997a, 105, 1st 
							group, Pl. XXXI, 4–15; 
							
							RPC II no. 469 | 
| 
							4 | 
							Sauromates II 
							(174/175–210/211) | 
							AE | 
							Triple 
							sestertius | 
							AD 180–196 | 
							Trębaczów, 
							Kazimierza Wielka District | 
							
							Frolova 1997a, Pl. XCI, 
							17; 
							
							RPC IV Temp. No. 3879 | 
| 
							5 | 
							Rhescuporis III 
							(211/212–228/229) | 
							AE | 
							›Denarius‹ | 
							AD 211–215 | 
							Staniątki, 
							Wieliczka District | 
							Frolova 1997b, 
							10 f., Pl. XIV, 7–10 | 
| 
							6 | 
							Ininthimeus 
							(234/235–238/239) | 
							AE | 
							›Denarius‹ | 
							234/235–238/239 | 
							Skłóty, Kutno 
							District | 
							
							Frolova 1997b, 37, 232, 
							Pl. XXXVII, no. 13; 
							
							RPC VII,2 –(unassigned; 
							ID 3499) | 
| 
							7 | 
							Undetermined 
							ruler | 
							AE | 
							Sestertius | 
							End of 1st to 
							beginning of the 3rd cent. AD | 
							Gąski, 
							Inowrocław District | 
							Cf. Frolova 
							1997a, Pls. XLIV–LXI | 
					
						
						
						[1]
						The authors 
						would like to 
						express their profound thanks to 
						Dr. Kirylo 
						Myzgin and Dr. hab. Arkadiusz Dymowski from the 
						University of Warsaw for valuable comments and remarks 
						on this text and to Dr. Ulrich Werz and Claire Franklin 
						for making our English readable. At the same time, we 
						would like to emphasize that all errors and shortcomings 
						are borne solely by ourselves.
						
						
						[2]
						
						Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018; Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 
						2013; Bodzek – Jellonek – Zając 2019, 60–62.
						
						
						[3]
						The research is 
						conducted by Jan Bulas, MA, Michał Kasiński PhD, an 
						employee of the Jagiellonian University, and Magdalena 
						Okońska-Bulas, MA.
						
						
						[4]
						On the 
						settlement from the Roman period and the early phase of 
						the migration period in Jakuszowice see Godłowski 1986; 
						Godłowski 1991; Godłowski 1995; Kaczanowski – Rodzińska 
						Nowak 2010. On monetary finds 
						at this site: Bursche 1997a; Bursche – Kaczanowski – 
						Rodzińska-Nowak 2000; Bodzek 2021; further bibliography 
						there.
						
						
						[5]
						
						Zagórzyce: Grygiel – Pikulski – Trojan 2009a; Grygiel – 
						Pikulski – Trojan 2009b; Bodzek 2009; Bodzek et al. 
						2016; Bejsce: Opozda 1967; Kunisz 1985, 24 f. no. 4; 
						Kaczanowski – Margos 2002, 9 no. 13; Kasiński – Bulas – 
						Okońska 2019.
						
						
						[6]
						
						Cf. 
						Kaczanowski – Margos 2002, 36 nos. 88–89; Komorowska 
						2014, 10 (Chwalibogowice); Kaczanowski – Margos 2002, 
						306–307 no. 728 (Stary Korczyn); ibidem 338 no. 822 
						(Uściszowice); ibidem 353 no. 875 (Wyszogród). 
						Further 
						bibliography there.
						
						
						[7]
						Roman denarii 
						found in the Przeworsk culture settlement in Trębaczów 
						will be the subject of a separate study.
						
						
						[8]
						Nota bene, it is 
						worth considering to what extent similar situations 
						affect the level of registration of finds. This 
						especially applies to discoveries made by so-called 
						detectorists, who when making uninteresting finds such 
						as such shapeless corroded copper nuggets might simply 
						throw them away. We thank Dr. K. Myzgin for this remark.
						
						
						[9]
						Zograph 1951, 
						204–205; Frolova 1997a, 149–153, especially p. 152 type 
						16.
						
						
						[10]
						
						Anokhin 1986, 116, 165 no. 618a.
						
						
						[11]
						It cannot be 
						ruled out that the bronze found in Gąski, Inowrocław 
						district (cf. table 1, no. 7) should be dated to 
						the 
						to the reign of Sauromates II. 
						A precise definition of this poorly preserved coin, 
						known to the authors of the present text only from 
						photographs, is not possible cf. Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 
						2018, Cat. 1.
						
						
						[12]
						
						Ibidem, Cat. 5.
						
						
						[13]
						Bodzek – 
						Madyda-Legutko 2013; Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018, Cat. 
						4.
						
						
						[14]
						
						Ibidem, Cat. 6.
						
						
						[15]
						
						Ibidem, Cat. 2.
						
						
						[16]
						
						Ibidem, Cat. 3
						
						
						[17]
						
						Cf. 
						note 11.
						
						
						[18]
						
						Cf. Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018, 56–57.
						
						
						[19]
						
						Cf. 
						Bodzek – Jellonek – Zając 2019, 69.
						
						
						[20]
						
						Personal communication; the piece is stored in the 
						St. Staszic Hrubieszów Muzeum.
						
						
						[21]
						Beidin 2017; 
						Beidin 2018; Myzgin – Beidin 2012; Myzgin – Beidin 2015.
						
						
						[22]
						Sidarovich 
						2011; Sidarovich 2014; Michelbertas 2001, 58.
						
						
						[23]
						Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018, 
						73–77. The Dacian direction of 
						the influx is less likely, although not entirely ruled 
						out. In today’s Romania, Bosporan coins were registered 
						in Horia, Tulcea County – bronze of Sauromates I (Mitrea 
						1964, 380 no. 52; Kunisz 1992, 158) – and in Poiana, 
						Galaţi County – bronze of Aspurgos (Mitrea 1978, 366 no. 
						63), gs. 2: 2–3 (367).
						
						
						[24]
						
						Cf. 
						Bodzek – Myzgin 2021.
						
						
						[25]
						
						Cf. 
						Dobrzańska 1999; Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018, 73–77.
						Among the numismatic evidence of interactions between 
						the populations of the aforementioned archaeological 
						cultures is the recording of finds of imitations of 
						Roman denarii, minted with the same dies, in the areas 
						of all three cultures; cf. Dymowski 2019a.
						
						
						[26]
						
						Cf. ibidem, especially 73–79.
						
						
						[27]
						
						Andrzejowski 2019; Andrzejowski 2021. 
						Further 
						bibliography there.
						
						
						[28]
						
						Bulas 2020.
						
						
						[29]
						
						Myzgin – Beidin 2012, 60 f.
						
						
						[30]
						G. Beidin (2017, 
						4) pointed to the possibility of assigning coins 
						formally classified to the first group to group 2 on the 
						basis of the presence of countermarks. Counter-marks 
						testifying to long circulation would make it possible to 
						distinguish between coins used before (in this case, 
						coins without countermarks) and during the Gothic Wars 
						(countermarked). However, this theory is difficult to 
						apply in relation to Polish finds, among which no 
						countermarked specimens have been registered so far. As 
						shown below, despite the lack of countermarks, most of 
						the Bosporan coins probably came to the present-day 
						Polish lands only at the end of the 2nd–1st half of the 
						3rd century AD.
						
						
						[31]
						
						Cf. Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018, 67.
						
						
						[32]
						The problem in 
						this case is the very unclear relationship between these 
						finds. In principle, it is not known whether the coins 
						in question were found together, whether the finds were 
						made on the same day, or whether they were simply 
						acquired on the same day. Cf. Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 
						1999; Bodzek – Madyda-Legutko 2018, 71.
						
						
						[33]
						A. Bursche (cf. 
						e.g. Bursche 1994, 472–475; Bursche 
						2004, 196–198; 
						Bursche 2006, 222) and M. Erdrich (2001,
						127 f.) 
						date the beginning of the aforementioned wave to the 
						time of the Marcomannic Wars (167–180 CE). According to 
						R. Wolters (1999, 385–386), the influx of denarii may 
						have started under Antoninus Pius (138–161) or Marcus 
						Aurelius (161–180), and T. Lucchelli (1998, 160 f.) 
						indicates the period from Trajan (98–117) to Antoninus 
						Pius as the beginning of the great wave of Roman silver. 
						A. Dymowski allows for three possibilities of the 
						arrival of the first imperial denarii: 1) in the final 
						period of Trajan’s reign (in connection with the Dacian 
						Wars [101–106]); 2) in the final years of Hadrian’s 
						reign (117–138) or during the reign of Antoninus Pius; 
						or 3) the beginning of a first large wave in the middle 
						of the reign of Antoninus Pius or under Marcus Aurelius, 
						and another great wave in the first years of the reign 
						of Septimius Severus (Dymowski 2013, 111–114). The end 
						of the influx of the great wave of denarii would have 
						taken place according to various concepts at the time of 
						Commodus (177–192) or at the beginning of the reign of 
						Septimius Severus (193–211) (e.g. Bursche 1994; Bursche 
						2006, 222; Lucchelli 1998, 160–162; Wolters 1999, 
						385–386; Erdrich 2001, 127 f.; Dymowski 2013, 113).
						
						
						[34]
						
						Cf. Dymowski 2019a.
						
						
						[35]
						A. Bursche and 
						A. Dymowski date the influx of third-century denarii to 
						the years 30–40 of the 3rd century AD. Cf. Bursche 2004, 
						201; Dymowski 2013, 113–114); on the problem of the 
						influx of Roman coins minted in the 3rd century AD and 
						later see Bursche 1996; Dymowski 2012; Dymowski 2013; 
						the issue of subaerati, copies and imitations of Roman 
						coins in Poland are discussed in Bursche 1997b; Bursche 
						– Kaczanowski – Rodzińska-Nowak 2000; Dymowski 2017; 
						Dymowski 2019a; Dymowski 2019b; Dymowski 2020; Dymowski 
						2021; Romanowski – Dulęba 2018; Więcek 2019. Of course, 
						we cannot exclude the production of some subaerati, 
						imitations or copies in the area of Wielbark or the 
						Przeworsk culture (cf. Dymowski 2020). Dymowski 2018 
						presented general comments on the influx of Roman coins 
						to the area of Lesser Poland.
						
						
						[36]
						On finds of Greek 
						coins minted before the 1st century BC see Mielczarek 
						1989; Mielczarek 1996; Mielczarek 2008; about Celtic and 
						other barbarian coins, e.g. Rudnicki 2012a; Rudnicki 
						2012b; Rudnicki 2013; Rudnicki –Miłek 2009; Rudnicki 
						–Miłek 2011; Florkiewicz 2009; Dulęba – Wysocki 2017; on 
						coins of the Roman Republic Dymowski 2016; Dymowski – 
						Rudnicki 2019.
						
						
						[37]
						
						Cf.
						Bodzek – Jellonek – 
						Zając 2019.
						
						
						[38]
						
						Cf. 
						Bodzek – Jellonek – Zając 2019, 68.
						
						
						[39]
						
						Cf. 
						Myzgin 2011; Myzgin 2012; Myzgin 2015; Myzgin 2017; 
						Myzgin 2018.
						
						
						[40]
						On the 
						possibility of influx to the Barbaricum of the 3rd 
						century AD denarii and antoniniani thanks to the 
						contacts between the Roman Empire and the Goths (i. e. 
						de facto the Cherniakhiv culture), see Dymowski 2013, 
						114; Dymowski 2017; Dymowski 2018, 46; Dymowski 2019a.
						
						
						[41]
						
						Myzgin – Beidin 2012.
						
						
						[42]
						
						Cf. 
						Bodzek – Jellonek – Zając 2019, 70; Bodzek 2021.




