Two gold medallions of the Apostolo Zeno Collection in the British Museum*
Abstract: 
				The paper aims to reconstruct the purchase, sale and current 
				location of some gold medallions acquired by the Venetian 
				erudite and collector Apostolo Zeno. In particular, there were 
				four specimens that Zeno sold to cardinal Alessandro Albani, 
				which later became part of the Vatican collection. Two of these 
				medallions were later bought by the Duke of Blacas and then 
				passed into the collection of the British Museum, where they are 
				currently kept.
Keywords: 
				Apostolo Zeno (http://viaf.org/viaf/14779941;
				
				
				http://d-nb.info/gnd/116980257); 
				Gold Medallions; Cardinal 
				Alessandro Albani (https://viaf.org/viaf/34465260/;
				
				
				http://d-nb.info/gnd/119212064); 
				Louis, Duke of Blacas (http://viaf.org/viaf/41979936;
				
				
				http://d-nb.info/gnd/1050400712); 
				British Museum. 
Zusammenfassung: Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, den Verbleib einiger Goldmedaillons aus dem Besitz des venezianischen Gelehrten und Sammlers Apostolo Zeno zu rekonstruieren: Vier Exemplare, die Zeno an den Kardinal Alessandro Albani verkauft hatte, gelangten schließlich in die Vatikanischen Museen. Zwei dieser Medaillons wurden später von Louis, Duc de Blacas d’Aulps erworben und befinden sich heute im Münzkabinett des British Museum.
Schlagwörter: Apostolo Zeno; Gold-Medaillons; Kardinal Alessandro Albani; Louis, Duc de Blacas d’Aulps; British Museum.On 12 September 1718 the 
				Venetian erudite Apostolo Zeno (1668–1750) arrived in Vienna, at 
				the court of the Emperor Charles VI of Habsburg (1711–1740) 
				where he remained, more or less permanently, until 
				1731, and where he devoted himself, from 1722 with increasing 
				assiduity and constancy, to the collection and the study of 
				ancient coins. As a result, an extraordinary collection of over 
				ten thousand pieces was achieved thanks to 
				the considerable wealth provided by his 
				service, as poet laureate, at the imperial court and to 
				the network of relationships he built and 
				maintained throughout his life.
Especially during the 
				first years in Vienna, Zeno had the opportunity to purchase some 
				gold medallions that soon, however, he decided to sell in order 
				to realise a significant profit, as confirmed by a passage in 
				the »Diario Zeniano«[1], 
				dated on 31 July 1745: »Una volta sola so d’aver venduto 
				medaglie[2]: 
				e furono quattro medaglioni d’oro, che diedi all’Albani per 170 
				zecchini: a me costavano 25 ongari«[3]. 
				Albani has to be identified with the Catholic cardinal 
				Alessandro Albani (1692–1779), born in Urbino, collector of 
				antiquities and art patron. 
Zeno 
				came into possession of the four specimens in different times 
				and circumstances. One of these medallions, 
				minted during the reign of Gallienus (253–268 A.D.), was 
				purchased between August and September 1723, when he was in 
				Prague for the coronation of Charles VI as King of Bohemia, and 
				he had the opportunity to acquire the precious specimen, as 
				testified by what he wrote to his half-brother Andrea Cornaro on 
				14 September 1723: »I giorni passati comperai qui un altro 
				bel medaglione d’oro di peso di quattro ungheri, con la 
				testa di Gallieno da una parte, e dall’altra con un Ercole con 
				clava, e pelle di lione, e la leggenda Virtus Gallieni Augusti«[4]. 
				Zeno’s mention to »un altro bel medaglione d’oro« 
				is indirectly alluding to the first medallion, struck by Valens 
				(364–378 A.D.), that the Count Lippe gave to him two years 
				earlier in Vienna[5].
The description of the 
				Gallienus specimen allows to easily identify the medallion: on 
				the obverse the head of the emperor laureate to the right and 
				the legend IMP GALLIENVS AVG COS V; while on the reverse 
				Hercules standing to the left with the lion’s skin, a branch in 
				the right hand, a club in the left and legend VIRT GALLIENI AVG[6].
				
As 
				already mentioned, four medallions were sold to cardinal Albani, 
				but unfortunately we do not know the circumstances that 
				led to the acquisition of the other two specimens.
				However, their description is provided 
				by Zeno himself in a letter of 13 March 1728, addressed to the 
				Somascan father Gianfrancesco Baldini (1677–1764) in Rome[7]. 
				At this date Apostolo already intended to sell his medallions 
				with the aim of obtaining the maximum 
				profit. He was quite reluctant to sell portions of his 
				numismatic collection, although minimal, and
				the statement »Una volta sola so d’aver venduto medaglie«, 
				leads to this conclusion, and suggests that it was a rather 
				exceptional fact. Perhaps he considered the 
				collection of gold medallions too expensive or too risky, 
				fearing of running into counterfeits[8], 
				and he came to the decision, certainly thoughtful, to sell the 
				four specimens in his possession with the aim, certainly not 
				secondary, to achieve a lucrative profit.
The following is the letter 
				Zeno wrote to Baldini: »A pié di questa (lettera)
				troverà la descrizione dei quattro medaglioni d’oro ch’io 
				tengo: dei quali però non sarò mai per privarmi per meno di 160.
				ungheri. Non se ne faccia maraviglia del prezzo, poiché 
				pel solo Valente ho potuto averne 70. e gli ho ricusati, non 
				volendone meno di cento«[9].
				In addition to the already mentioned 
				specimens of Valens and Gallienus, Zeno reported the description 
				of the other two medallions: 
I. IMP GALLIENVS AVG COS. V. Gallieni caput galeatam. 
VIRT GALLIENI AVG. 
				Hercules nudus, dextrorsum stans, dextra oleae ramum, sinistra 
				clavam erectam, leoninis spoliis in laevum brachium rejectis.
				Pesa quattro ungheri [»weighs four 
				ungheri«].
II. 
				FL VAL CONSTANTIVS NOB CAES. Caput Constantinii Chlori 
				radiatum.
PRINCIPI IVVENTVTIS. 
				Constantius laureatus, habituque militari ornatus, sinistrorsum 
				stans, d. spiculum transversum gestat, s. globum. In imo 
				PROM. Pesa quattro ungheri [»weighs 
				four ungheri«][10].
III. 
				D N VALENS MAX. AVGVSTVS. Caput Valentis cum diademate 
				ex lapillis & margaritis, cum paludamento ad pectus gemmata 
				fibula revincto, dextram expansam altollens, s. victoriam tenet, 
				quae s. ramum gerit, d. vero laureolam porrigit Imperatori. 
				 
D N VALENS VICTOR SEMPER 
				AVG. Imperator nimbo ornatus, cum paludamento ad pectus, a 
				fronte stans, super currum a sex equis tractum, dextra expansa & 
				elata, s. globum tenet. Hinc & inde volitant duae victoriae 
				lauream illi porrigentes. In ima parte plures, ut videntur, 
				monetarum acervi, & litterae R M. Pesa dieci ungheri e mezzo in 
				circa [»weighs about ten ungheri and 
				half«].
				 Sopra questo medaglione il P. 
				Paoli ha stampata un’erudita dissertazione 
				[regarding this medallion, P. Paoli wrote 
				an erudite dissertation][11].
IV. ALEΞANΔΡΟΥ.
				Victoria dextrorsum stans, d. 
				lauream, s. sceptrum: pro pedibus, vas utrinque ansatum. 
				Pesa cinque ungheri [»weighs 
				five ungheri«][12]. 
The 
				letter to Baldini provides a last important information:
				»Tutti i suddetti medaglioni d’oro purissimo 
				sono d’indubitata antichità, e d’intera conservazione. In quello 
				di Gallieno v’è un buco sopra la testa; e questo è il solo 
				difetto che v’abbia«[13]. 
The exact date of the 
				sale of the medallions to Albani is unknown but in 1738 the 
				collection of the medallions of the Cardinal, including the four 
				specimens sold by Zeno, passed to the Vatican collection[14] 
				and the transaction, therefore, must have occurred before that 
				year.
Between 1739 and 1744 a 
				work was published, in two volumes, edited by Rodolfo Venuti 
				(1705–1763)[15]: 
				»Antiqua numismata maximi moduli Aurea, Argentea, Aerea, 
				ex Museo Alexandri S.R.E. Card. Albani in Vaticanam Bibliothecam 
				a Clemente XII Pont Opt Max translata (…)«, in 
				which he described many of the medallions of the 
				former Albani collection, and among them, the four specimens 
				which had belonged to Zeno. In the first volume, 
				published in 1739, the double stater of Alexander the Great 
				is indicated (see note 12, and fig. 1) with a weight 
				of 16.767 g[16], 
				lighter than the one reported by Zeno (»cinque ungheri«, 
				about 17.25 g, see note 3). The other three specimens were 
				included in the second volume, published in 1744; following the 
				chronological order it mentioned the medallion of Gallienus (fig. 
				3), with a weight of 13.91 g[17], 
				almost the same cited by Zeno (»quattro ungheri«,
				about 13.8 
				g). It is however important to 
				highlight a detail: its reproduction does not present the hole 
				over the head (see above). It could be an oversight or, more 
				likely, the engraver’s intention to show the intact medallion[18]. 
				The last two specimens, related to Costantius Chlorus (fig. 
				6) 
				and Valens (fig. 2), are respectively of a weight of 
				12.64 g (Zeno indicated »quattro ungheri«, 
				13.8 g)[19] 
				and 36.25 g, almost the same mentioned 
				by Zeno (»dieci ungheri e mezzo in circa«)[20].
				
				
				
The medallions were 
				displaced in 1798, when, under the terms of the treaty of 
				Tolentino, stipulated the previous year, the specimens from the 
				Albani collection, as well as many other precious coins, were 
				taken from the Vatican collection by the delegates 
				of the French Republic, and brought to Paris[21].
				
				
				
We can affirm with 
				reasonable certainty that two of the four medallions belonged to 
				Apostolo Zeno are now kept in the British Museum, both coming 
				from the Louis de Blacas d’Aulps collection, which was entirely 
				purchased by the Museum in 1867. The first medallion is 
				the Gallienus one (Museum 
				number 1867,0101.821, with a 
				weight of 13.980 g, fig. 5), declared to be owned, in the 
				information entry of the Museum, by the Duke of Blacas[22]. 
				The aristocrat is mentioned as the owner of the specimen also in 
				the fourth volume of the first edition of Henry Cohen’s work, »Description 
				historique des monnaies frappées sous l’Empire Romain«, 
				published in 1860[23]. 
				In 1868 Frederic W. Madden (1839–1904) writing for the 
				Numismatic Chronicle about the gold coins of the Blacas 
				Collection acquired the previous year by the British Museum, 
				reported exactly this 
				Gallienus medallion (fig. 4)[24]. 
				The Duke’s name appears also in the Francesco Gnecchi’s work on 
				the Roman medallions, published in 1912, in which the author 
				reports the Gallienus medallion and, among the known pieces, a 
				specimen preserved in London with the following words: »già 
				Blacas anticamente Vaticano, m. 28, gr. 14.000«[25].
				It is obviously the medallion kept in 
				the British Museum with the identification number mentioned
				above, and it is more than plausible to 
				conclude that it is the same specimen belonged to cardinal 
				Albani, and before to Apostolo Zeno, even more so if we consider 
				the provenance of the Vatican collection. 
				Lastly, to corroborate the hypothesis there is also 
				another important clue represented by the hole placed over the 
				head of Gallienus, a detail also reported by Zeno in his letter 
				to Baldini (»un buco sopra la 
				testa«, see above). 
Thanks to the 
				publication of Gnecchi we can trace also the location of the 
				Costantius Chlorus medallion. In the 
				concerning form the author wrote: »Londra (già Blacas 
				anticamente Vat. Alb.) m. 25, g. 12,975«[26]. 
				Therefore, this specimen followed the same path of the previous 
				one to reach the collection of the British Museum, where it is 
				still kept (Museum 
				number 1867,0101.879, with a weight of 
				12.830 g, fig. 7)[27]. 
				
				
The research of the 
				specimens that belonged to the numismatic collection of Apostolo 
				Zeno is partly the subject of my doctoral thesis, and represents 
				a fascinating evolving path that it can never really says to be 
				concluded. Nevertheless, every coin found, 
				and returned, to its collector’s history helps to keep 
				alive the interest for a collector and 
				a collection that do not really deserve to be forgotten.
						
						* This article mainly derives from 
						my doctoral thesis: »La collezione numismatica di 
						Apostolo Zeno«, a research project in 
						collaboration between the Universities of Venezia Ca’ 
						Foscari, Udine and Trieste, and in cooperation agreement 
						with the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
						
						
						[1] 
						The 
						Diary was written by Marco Forcellini (1712–1793), the 
						personal secretary and friend of Apostolo Zeno, and it 
						contains some passages of the conversations the two 
						entertained since 1745. The manuscript is kept in the 
						Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, Fondo 
						Ashburnham 1502, and its content were published in 2012 
						edited by Corrado Viola with the title of »Diario 
						Zeniano (Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Ashb. 
						1502) Marco Forcellini«.
						
						
						[2] 
						Apostolo Zeno (and his numerous interlocutors), in all 
						documentation examined, refers to ancient coins as 
						»medals«. This use originated 
						from the XIV century and in the XVIII 
						century it was fully accepted. See 
						Saccocci 
						2001, 58 and, for further details on 
						this issue, Missere Fontana 1995 and 
						Mc Crory 
						1999.
						
						
						[3] 
						»Only once I had sold medals: they were four gold 
						medallions, which I gave to Albani for 170 
						zecchini, 
						and to me they cost 25 ongari« [=
						Hungarian ducats]:  
						Viola 2012, 97. At the 
						time of Zeno, the ongaro (or 
						ungaro, 
						unghero) weighed approximately 3.45 g with a gold 
						content of 986/1000: cf. Martinori 1915, 354, under the 
						heading »Ongaro di Cremnitz o di Kremnitz«. This coin 
						had about the same weight of the 
						zecchino of 
						Venice, and in 1745 (the year of this statement), the 
						doge was Pietro Grimani (1741–1752) and his 
						zecchini 
						had a weight between 3,37 g and 3,50 g: cf. CNI
						VIII, 451, n° 53–54; Montenegro 2012, 592, n° 2644; 
						finally, see a coin of Grimani auctioned by the Auction 
						House Bertolami Fine Art (E-Auction 97, 27–28 March 
						2021, Lot 1420).
						
						
						[4] 
						»The past few days I 
						bought here another beautiful gold medallion, weighting 
						four ungheri, with the head of Gallienus on one 
						side, and on the other Hercules with the club and the 
						lion skin, and the legend VIRTVS GALLIENI AVGVSTI«:
						Lettere Zeno 1785, vol. III, Lett. 601, 
						382; cf. »Fontes Inediti Numismaticae Antiquae«
						(from now on, »FINA«), ref. 6744:
						
						
						
						
						https://fina.oeaw.ac.at/wiki/index.php/Apostolo_Zeno_-_Andrea_Cornaro_-_1723-9-14 
						[transl. R. Tomassoni].
						
						
						[5] 
						Lettere Zeno 1785, vol. III, Lett. 535, 
						226–227; cf. FINA, ref. 6793:
						
						
						
						https://fina.oeaw.ac.at/wiki/index.php/Apostolo_Zeno_-_Pier_Caterino_Zeno_-_1721-1-4;
						Viola 2012, 97, suggests that 
						the Count Lippe could be Rudolf Ferdinand Count of 
						Lippe-Biesterfeld (1678-1736); Tomassoni 
						2021, 113–115. The medallion will be described below in 
						further detail.
						
						
						[7] 
						The friendship and the epistolary exchange 
						between Zeno and Baldini intensified from 1723–1724, 
						when Apostolo bought the collection of 
						Roman 
						imperial silver coins of the Somascan Father.
						Baldini’s competence in the 
						numismatic field is well known and 
						it is enough to mention 
						his updated edition of the work of Jean Foy Vaillant 
						(1632–1706): »Numismata imperatorum Romanorum 
						praestantiora a Iulio Caesare ad Postumum«, in 
						three volumes, published in Rome in 1743. For a complete 
						analysis on these issues I refer to my doctoral thesis,
						Tomassoni 2021, in particular to chs. 2 
						(pp. 27–36), and 6.
						
						
						[8] 
						The counterfeiting was an 
						issue much felt by Zeno and in general by collectors of 
						his time, see Tomassoni 2021, 
						ch. 5. The question of false coins and their authors was 
						already known and discussed in the 16th century, see 
						Missere Fontana 2013.
						
						
						[9] 
						»At the foot of this 
						(letter) you will find the description of the four 
						gold medallions that I have: of which, however, I will 
						never be deprived for less than 160. ungheri. Do 
						not be surprised by the price, since only for Valens I 
						could have 70. and I declined, not wanting less than one 
						hundred«: Lettere Zeno 
						1785, vol. IV, Lett. 736, 238; cf. FINA, 
						ref. 6654:
						
						
						https://fina.oeaw.ac.at/wiki/index.php/Apostolo_Zeno_-_Gian_Francesco_Baldini_-_1728-3-13
						[transl. R. Tomassoni].
						
						
						[10] 
						Cohen 1888, vol.
						VII, 79, n° 227.
						
						
						[11] 
						Cf.
						
						RIC IX, 122, n° 25. 
						The dissertation of Father Sebastiano 
						Paoli (or Pauli, 1684–1751) was published in 1722 under 
						the title »De Nummo Aureo Valentis Imp«. 
						For more information on this kind of medallion, see
						Vondrovec 2010.
						
						
						[12] 
						Lettere Zeno 1785, vol. IV, Lett. 736, 
						239–240. The last medallion 
						mentioned is clearly a double stater of Alexander the 
						Great, cf.
						
						Price 1991, vol. I, 107, n° 167.
						
						
						[13] 
						»All the mentioned 
						medallions are of pure gold and undoubtedly antique, and 
						well-preserved. In Gallienus’ one 
						there is a hole over the head; and 
						this is the only defect« [transl. R. Tomassoni].
						
						
						[14] 
						Le Grelle 1965, p. 
						XVIII.
						
						
						[15] 
						Indeed, Venuti reached a remarkable reputation thanks to 
						the editions of the numismatic catalogues of Albani’s, 
						Mattei’s and Odescalchi’s collections. In 1734 he also 
						became auditor in Rome of cardinal Albani and the 
						curator of his antiquarian collection. In 1744 Pope 
						Benedict XIV (1740–1758) appointed Venuti as apostolic 
						antiquary and apostolic commissioner over all 
						›archaeological excavations‹: see Cristofani 1983, 49.
						
						
						[16] 
						Venuti 1739, 
						vol. I, 1 and pl. 1. Following 
						the text: »Ex Auro. Pond. Den. XIV. Gr. IX.«: 
						the weight is therefore 14 deniers and 9 grains. If we 
						consider that 1 ounce = 24 deniers, 1 denier = 24 
						grains, and 1 grain = 0,0486 g (the weight equivalence 
						in the city of Rome, see Martinori 
						1915, 191), we will have the following equation: 
						[(14 x 24) + 9] = 345 grains x 0,0486 g = 16,767 g.
						
						
						[17] 
						Venuti 1739, vol. II, 47 
						and pl. 83. The weight is 11 
						deniers and 22 grains: it means 13.91 g (see above).
						
						
						[18] The 
						engravings of the medallions were made by the painter 
						Gaetano Piccini: see Le Grelle 1965, p. XVIII, note 10.
						
						
						[19] 
						Venuti 1739, vol. 
						II, 103 and pl. 111. The weight is 10 deniers and 20 
						grains: it means 13.8 g (see note 16).
						
						
						[20] 
						Venuti 1739, vol. II, 
						109 and pl. 114. The weight is 1 ounce, 7 deniers and 2 
						grains: it means 36.25 g (see note 16).
						
						
						[21] 
						Gnecchi 1905, 
						16 and following. See also Gnecchi 
						1912, vol. I, 36 (about Valens’ medallion). 
						The treaty of Tolentino was signed on 19 February 1797 
						between the French of Napoleon Bonaparte, who had 
						occupied the papal territories of central Italy, and the 
						diplomates of Pope Pius VI (1775–1799). In particular, 
						the articles 10 and 12 of the treaty obliged the Pope to 
						pay to the French army a compensation of 30 million of
						lire tornesi (tornesel or tornese), in cash, 
						diamonds and other precious objects. 
						To deepen this topic, see Filippone 
						1959.
						
						
						[22] 
						In this entry there were no 
						references to Apostolo Zeno or cardinal Albani; these 
						were recently added following the hypothesis of this 
						article, formulated previously in my doctoral thesis.
						
						
						[23] 
						Cohen 1860, 353, n° 22.
						
						
						[24] 
						Madden 1868, 13 and pl. IV, n° 5.
						
						
						[25] 
						»(F)ormerly Blacas, anciently 
						Vatican, mm 28, 14.000 g«: 
						Gnecchi 1912, vol. I, 7–8, n° 16.
						
						
						[26] 
						»London (formerly Blacas 
						Vat. Alb.) mm. 25, 12.975 g«:
						Gnecchi 1912, 13, n° 3.
						
						
						[27] 
						Also this specimen is 
						described in the first edition of the work of Henry 
						Cohen (see above), in the fifth volume, as belonging to 
						the collection of the Duke of Blacas: Cohen 
						1861, 553, n° 6; the medallion is reported as 
						well in the already mentioned publication of Madden 
						1868, 28, n° 300 and pl. V, n° 10.