Can
Radical Capitalism Survive the Disasters It Creates?
By John Gray, The Guardian
Posted on September 22, 2007, Printed on September 22, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/story/63288/
Over the past few decades,
many of the ideas of the far left have found new homes on the right. Lenin
believed that it was in conditions of catastrophic upheaval that humanity
advances most rapidly, and the idea that economic progress can be achieved
through the devastation of entire societies has been a key part of the
neo-liberal cult of the free market. Soviet-style economies left an inheritance
of human and ecological devastation, while neo-liberal policies have had
results that are not radically dissimilar in many countries. Yet, while
the Marxist faith in central planning is now confined to a few dingy sects,
a quasi-religious belief in free markets continues to shape the policies
of governments.
Many writers have pointed
to the havoc and ruin that have accompanied the imposition of free markets
across the world. Whether in Africa, Asia, Latin America or post-communist
Europe, policies of wholesale privatisation and structural adjustment
have led to declining economic activity and social dislocation on a massive
scale. Anyone who has watched a country lurch from one crisis to another
as the bureaucrats of the IMF impose cut after cut in pursuit of the holy
grail of stabilisation will recognise the process Naomi Klein describes
in her latest and most important book to date. Visiting Argentina not
long before the economic collapse of 2002, I found the government struggling
to implement an IMF diktat to roll back public spending at a time when
the economy was already rapidly contracting. The result was predictable,
and the country was plunged into a depression, with calamitous consequences
in terms of poverty and social breakdown.
Klein believes that neo-liberalism
belongs among "the closed, fundamentalist doctrines that cannot co-exist
with other belief-systems … The world as it is must be erased to make
way for their purist invention. Rooted in biblical fantasies of great
floods and great fires, it is a logic that leads ineluctably towards violence."
As Klein sees it, the social breakdowns that have accompanied neo-liberal
economic policies are not the result of incompetence or mismanagement.
They are integral to the free-market project, which can only advance against
a background of disasters. At times, writing in a populist vein that echoes
her first book No Logo, published seven years ago, Klein seems
to suggest that these disasters are manufactured as part of a deliberate
policy framed by corporations with hidden influence in government. Her
more considered view, which is also more plausible, is that disaster is
part of the normal functioning of the type of capitalism we have today:
"An economic system that requires constant growth, while bucking almost
all serious attempts at environmental regulation, generates a steady stream
of disasters all on its own, whether military, ecological or financial.
The appetite for easy, short-term profits offered by purely speculative
investment has turned the stock, currency and real estate markets into
crisis-creation machines, as the Asian financial crisis, the Mexican peso
crisis and the dotcom collapse all demonstrate."
There are very few books that
really help us understand the present. The Shock Doctrine is one
of those books. Ranging across the world, Klein exposes the strikingly
similar policies that enabled the imposition of free markets in countries
as different as Pinochet's Chile, Yeltsin's Russia, China and post-Saddam
Iraq. Part of the power of this book comes from the parallels she observes
in seemingly unrelated developments. In a fascinating and alarming examination
of the underside of recent history, she notes the affinities between the
policies of shock therapy imposed in the course of neo-liberal market
reform and the techniques of torture that have been routinely used by
the US in the course of the "war on terror." Klein begins her first chapter
with a moving account of a conversation she had with a victim of a covert
programme of mind-control experiments, carried out in Canada in the 1950s,
which used people suffering from minor psychiatric ailments to try out
techniques of "de-patterning" that aimed to scramble and reshape their
personalities.
Employing electroshock therapy,
sensory deprivation and drug-induced comas, these experiments helped develop
some of the "coercive interrogation techniques" that have been practised
in Guantánamo Bay. Klein uses torture as a metaphor, and does not claim
any cause-and-effect link between its re-emergence and the rise of neo-liberal
shock therapy; but she does point to some disquieting similarities. Individuals
and societies have been "de-patterned" with the aim of remaking them on
a better, more rational model. In each case, the experiments have failed,
while inflicting lasting and often irreparable damage on those who were
subjected to them.
But has the free market experiment
failed? As Klein sees it, free market shock therapy may actually have
succeeded in achieving its true objectives. Post-invasion Iraq may be
"a ghoulish dystopia where going to a simple business meeting could get
you lynched, burned alive or beheaded." Even so, Klein points out, Halliburton
is making handsome profits -- it has built the green zone as a corporate
city-state, and taken on many of the traditional functions of the armed
forces in Iraq. An entire society has been destroyed, but the corporations
that operate in the ruins are doing rather well. Klein's message, then,
seems to be that -- at least in its own, profit-centred terms -- disaster
capitalism works.
There can be no doubt that
fortunes have been reaped from the Iraq war as they have been from other
experiments in disaster capitalism. Yet I remain unconvinced that the
corporations Klein berates throughout the book understand, let alone control,
the anarchic global capitalism that has been allowed to develop over the
past couple of decades -- any more than the neo-liberal ideologues who
helped create it foresaw where it would lead. Rightly, Klein insists that
free market ideology must bear responsibility for the crimes committed
on its behalf -- just as Marxist ideology must be held to account for
the crimes of communism. But she says remarkably little about the illusions
by which neo-liberal ideologues were themselves blinded. Milton Friedman
and his disciples believed a western-style free market would spring up
spontaneously in post-communist Russia. They were left gawping when central
planning was followed by the criminalised free-for-all of the '90s, and
were unprepared for the rise of Putin's resource-based state capitalism.
These ideologues were not the sinister, Dr. Strangelove-like figures of
the anti-capitalist imagination. They were comically deluded bien-pensants,
who promoted their utopian schemes with messianic fervour and have been
left stranded by history, as the radiant future they confidently predicted
has failed to arrive.
The neo-liberal order is already
facing intractable problems. The Iraq war may have allowed another experiment
in shock therapy, but a failed state has been created as a result of which
Gulf oil -- which a former chair of the US joint chiefs of staff accurately
described as "the jugular vein of global capitalism" -- is less secure
than before. Faced with defeat in Iraq, the Bush administration seems
to be gearing up for an assault on Iran -- a desperate move that would
magnify the existing catastrophe many times over. At the same time financial
crisis has reached into the American heartland as an implosion in speculation-driven
credit markets has started to spread throughout the system. It is impossible
to know how these crises will develop, but it is hard to resist the suspicion
that disaster capitalism is now creating disasters larger than it can
handle.
John Gray's most recent
book is Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and The Death of Utopia (Allen
Lane)
©
2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/63288/
|